Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot
The French study is not a true double blind study. The control group was drawn from patients who were excluded due to other medical reasons, and patients from another facility where they were not offered the therapy.

Clearly in an emergency situation it makes sense to shift the testing rules to avoid withholding treatment from patients. Also, the doctors doing the research used an objective test of the drugs efficacy, actual viral load measurement, which allows determination of effectiveness with smaller populations.

As an example, for some other kinds of drugs it is difficult to determine effectiveness without a large and carefully controlled test population due to the difficulty in measuring the outcome. Consider the problem of measuring the effectiveness of an anti-depressant, where the patients feelings are what needs to be measured.

149 posted on 03/20/2020 4:11:06 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: freeandfreezing
As an example, for some other kinds of drugs it is difficult to determine effectiveness without a large and carefully controlled test population due to the difficulty in measuring the outcome.

We are not talking about a tranquilizer here, we are talking a drug that may prevent death, if it doesn't you can pretty much know it didn't work. Why withhold treatment from someone who is dying anyway and they know the risk?

155 posted on 03/20/2020 8:25:46 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson