Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitutional Carry Being Stopped by FUDDS in Tennessee: And They Are REALLY Pis&%$# Me OFF!
YouTube ^ | Mar 4, 2020 | Reid Henrichs

Posted on 03/04/2020 6:56:50 PM PST by real saxophonist

In this informative video, Reid Henrichs of Valor Ridge discusses "instructors" who compromise on the Bill of Rights and their descent into irrelevancy. If they have a problem with me or what I say in this video, they are more than welcome to come to Valor Ridge and meet me and I can show them just how incompetent, unskilled, and ignorant they are when it comes to firearms via some simple marksmanship tests and tasks. But I doubt they have the courage or motivation to truly see what they really are.

5 minute video


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitutionalcarry; elmerfudd; fudds; tennessee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: TMN78247
The PROBLEM is that ANY pump or semi-auto shotgun “can be modified” to fire more than 3 shots.

The one I had would require you to completely build some alternate feeding tube, and some quality machine work, which certainly could not be done on the fly. I suppose you could weld a bunch of single shot together otherwise I imagine you could build something from scratch about as easy.

I was not supporting the FUDD claims, just making a point.

I would rather try and get people to quit misrepresenting the 2nd amendment. The 2nd does not give you the right to own or carry a gun, your creator gave you that inalienable right, the 2nd just says the government can't interfere with that right, which they happily ignore and we let them. Personally I think anyone not in prison or restrained in a hospital has the right to own guns or any other weapon.

41 posted on 03/06/2020 4:25:44 PM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

My point is that the “anti-gun LOONS”, LIARS, BIGOTS & FOOLS use “can be modified” (no matter how difficult that it is to do) to STOP everyone from possessing a semi-auto or pump firearm.

Fyi, I “monitor” a lot of LEFTIST RADICAL sites & many of the “Antis” HATE every sort of firearm & some are even trying to PROHIBIT everything but FLINTLOCK MUSKETS & RIFLES to all civilians.
(One site that I monitor had several people who said that “psychologically tested, background investigated & permitted by the Chief of the State Police” MIGHT be allowed to own a single-shot or double barrel shotgun but ONLY on their own premises. = That “discussion” also said that, “The permission to possess a shotgun may be revoked at any time & the shotgun confiscated without payment, if any adult within 5 miles of their residence objects to their ownership of a gun” AND “There must be a minimum of a 120 day waiting period to receive the shotgun from the time of payment to delivery by the seller.”)

As I said, the “ANTIs” are HATERS, FOOLS & “Little Hitlers”, who lack common sense & just want to “run everyone’s lives”.

Yours, TMN78247


42 posted on 03/07/2020 12:44:48 PM PST by TMN78247 ("VICTORY or DEATH", William Barrett Travis, LtCol, comdt., Fortress of the Alamo, Bejar, 1836)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TMN78247

My position is if you are not in custody or committed to monitored help facility, the government has no right to say yo can’t own a weapon. That is what the 2nd really says.


43 posted on 03/07/2020 8:15:42 PM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

ImVho, ALL so-called “gun control laws &regulations” are an infringement on our NATURAL RIGHTS.

I’m for REPEAL of every federal gun statute & prohibiting the passing of any more such laws/regulations.

I also FAVOR a twenty year additional mandatory sentence to prison for committing OR attempting any violent felony or felony theft, while armed with any “deadly weapon”. Further, that 20 years should be served FIRST & IN FULL before beginning any other sentence which the criminal may have received.
(As a retired LEO, I would expect that single new law to CUT the violent felony crime rate by 25-30%, as this is a REALLY EASY case to prosecute. = For example, was the criminal ARMED with any deadly weapon at the time that he/she committed or attempted homicide, robbery, kidnapping, sale of narcotics, burglary, etc.? = IF he or she WAS armed, the criminal is found guilty & soon begins serving the 20 years.)

Yours, TMN78247


44 posted on 03/07/2020 8:55:55 PM PST by TMN78247 ("VICTORY or DEATH", William Barrett Travis, LtCol, comdt., Fortress of the Alamo, Bejar, 1836)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TMN78247
IF he or she WAS armed, the criminal is found guilty & soon begins serving the 20 years.)

Ditto

45 posted on 03/08/2020 2:15:11 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson