Destroying valuable property is not rational.
Those who wish a disarmed population do not consider guns to be valuable property.
1 posted on
03/01/2020 5:08:36 AM PST by
marktwain
To: marktwain
This is to compliment the red flag law no doubt.
Confiscate and destroy immediately.
2 posted on
03/01/2020 5:11:41 AM PST by
headstamp 2
(There's a stairway to heaven, but there's also a highway to hell.)
To: marktwain
“Provisions were made for the destruction of firearms which could not be legally owned.”
“... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
“Provisions were made for the destruction of firearms which could not be legally owned.”
“... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
3 posted on
03/01/2020 5:12:33 AM PST by
coloradan
(The Enemy Media isn't chartered to inform but rather to advance the interests of certain elites.)
To: marktwain
Why we NEED is a "Bill to Allow Destruction of People Who Want To Destroy Guns" !
"A traitor is everyone who does not agree with me."
King George III
The United States Citizens KNOW that they're going to have to fight TYRANTS in their own government.
You can
not protect life, without
the ability to take life.
While you are WAITING for the police to respond, someone could be losing their life.
All people of a responsible age should be armed.
As
EternalVigilance reminded us:
The Second Amendment IS Pro-Life.
"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life;
Secondly, to liberty;
Thirdly, to property;together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.
These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation,commonly called the first law of nature...In short, it is the greatest absurdity to suppose it in the power of one, or any number of men, at the entering into society,
to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights; when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution,
is for the support, protection, and defence of those very rights;
the principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property.
If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right,
the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation.
The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty,it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift
and voluntarily become a slave."
Click here to read the 12 page pamphlet.
Let us NEVER FORGET THAT !
Let's subjugate them to OUR end game, DUST!
"COMPROMISE" is
a DIRTY word!
People who study the Bible know that
COMPROMISE almost always leads to destruction.
It's time to mock the "Gun Control" Zombies!
"Gun Control" is
a firm grip, steady breathing, accurate aim (developed by lots of practice), and a slow trigger pull.
4 posted on
03/01/2020 5:17:38 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: marktwain
To: marktwain
I was thinking, wouldn’t it give me the warm and fuzzies if I could drop off my old, used firearms with my old, used clothes at the Salvation Army so they could go to the poor.
8 posted on
03/01/2020 5:32:45 AM PST by
RubinBoomer
(Please be nice. I am new here. I'm open to doing things the FR way, just need to know.)
To: marktwain
“Destroying valuable property is not rational.”
Liberals, leftists, commies, fascists, socialists etc are not rational.
9 posted on
03/01/2020 5:34:35 AM PST by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: marktwain
Destruction of valuable resources always sickens me.
10 posted on
03/01/2020 5:39:01 AM PST by
wally_bert
(Spend like you were going to the electric chair!)
To: marktwain
And by ‘destruction’, they mean the nice ones are going home with the high ranking officers.
11 posted on
03/01/2020 5:43:24 AM PST by
real saxophonist
(Everything I Play Gone Be Funky, From Now On)
To: marktwain
This is likely to make more people realize the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, which is to prevent a totalitarian government from coming to power.
13 posted on
03/01/2020 6:50:35 AM PST by
libertylover
(Socialism will always look good to those who think they can get something for nothing.)
To: marktwain
This doesn’t sound right; especially from the point of view of those concerned about climate change.
Yes, it took a lot of fossil fuel energy to create those guns, and it will take even more to melt down the steel. Huge carbon footprint.
But from the gun manufacturers and retail gun sellers point of view, eliminating this source of old guns for the public to buy will be a good thing. The destroyed guns are no longer in competition.
It may be that as gun manufacturers ramp up production to meet demand, the per unit cost to make new guns will decrease (economies of scale) allowing consumers everywhere to benefit from the lower unit cost.
Soon we will be able to buy even more new guns with the same money.
To: marktwain
The anti-gun crowd will soon say guns taken by police in red flag situations must be destroyed at once so a later exoneration won’t “put guns on the streets.
Guns confiscated by police from a person who has it while committing a felony or a person already a felon and had a gun should first be checked to see if it had been stolen and if so, it should be returned to the legal owner.
After that the remaining guns not claimed should be sold to a legal gun dealer so the police budget benefits.
16 posted on
03/01/2020 8:56:40 AM PST by
RicocheT
(Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson