Posted on 03/01/2020 2:30:58 AM PST by fwdude
it was WHACKED then and is even more WHACKED now! (pun intended)
Sorry Charlie, we are not chickens or Tuna for that matter.
Yours is a typical response of repeating something you have been told without thinking about it.
When I was stationed at the Pentagon, there was a park near the marina where they all trolled. After my first to lunch time runs, I had to alter my route and started running out to the Lincoln Memorial and back.
Probably because from what I've seen, many gay men want two things at the same time: they want to be accepted during their non-sexual moments (at work, for instance) but then they want the ability to shock and horrify whenever the urge moves them. Which is why they campaign for acceptance, and then display increasingly ostentatious acts of dress and behavior.
In fact, I think the polarization of America is working to fulfill their needs: one half of America constantly assures them of their lovability and worth, and the other half is always there when they want someone to shock and disgust. That way they can run back and forth between the two groups, being offensive to religious conservatives, and running back to be reassured by the liberals. They'd be miserable without either one because they crave both kinds of attention, positive and negative. That, and the sensation of power that comes from shocking and offending people. Constantly.
That’s exactly right. Men and women have different sexual urges, the concrete proof of this is that gay men are the only ones prowling parks and rest stops at 3:00am for guaranteed free anonymous sex.
Freegards
Something I heard back in high school; women need a reason to have sex, men just need a place. Over my close to fifty years on this planet I’ve found this to be mostly true.
I’ve slept in many a rest area and never once had anyone approach my car
What You’re Not Supposed To Notice
Abnormal people and that covers a lot of people yet the liberal media,schools,Hollywood still works on it’s grooming program.
HOMOSEXUAL, because there’s nothing GAY about it.
Had Zimmerman pulled his firearm at Martin's approach, Martin would likely have fled and might be alive today. Or not; someone else eventually might have had to shoot him.
Were you aware that even “AIDS” is now considered passé? The newest term is “advance HIV infection.”
As the media, education, pop culture and political class sez, Sodomites are just like us, just like us, just like us. And if we’re not just like them, we’re bigots and homophobes.
I keep hearing that, but why did the Nazis put some homosexuals into concentration camps?
First line response: So, that’s why they call themselves gay. They know they’re not, just hopeful.
Women may not go down to the park or the rest area to pick up guys, but many if not most women I have known (who grew up during or after the sexual revolution) are still "easy" given the right circumstances.
I will add that the women I have known who are sexually aggressive are more so when they think the men they are tempting are discreet.
In thinking about this matter, I have tried to tally up mentally the times I have been propositioned by women I was not involved with romantically (including business associates). This list immediately became so large that I gave up. And BTW, the only time I considered giving in to such a proposition was when I was romantically interested in the woman and naively thought that was her intention.
You are astute in your entry. All the things in your post do lead to one finality by the people around them: things that either greatly differ or are new and aggressive in our society create mistrust. Mistrust creates fear. So as long as the topic is handled this way, it will, at best, be determined as evil and not be accepted as anything other than that. So it may be legal against the people, but with the pandering of the politicians to make it legal, it will be shunned even within the non-religious community with fear.
rwood
I keep hearing that, but why did the Nazis put some homosexuals into concentration camps?
The educated profs in China supported Mao in the early day. Then they were assigned to shovel manure in the country as they were a threat to those in power.
Make sense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.