Posted on 02/26/2020 8:01:22 AM PST by Kaslin
I experienced deja vu watching the Democrats rule change to include Michael Bloomberg into their debates, despite their refusal to change those rules for other Democrats who hadnt met the qualifications for inclusion. For nearly twenty years Ive watched Democrats change the rules to suit their convenience of the moment.
For example, those who are old enough will remember the case of Robert Torricelli, the Democrat senator from New Jersey who withdrew from his Senate race because questions about his campaign finance practices were causing him to lose popularity and threaten that his Republican opponent might actually defeat him. However, his withdrawal left the Democrats without a candidate in that race, which in turn endangered their bare 1 seat majority in the Senate. To further complicate matters for the Democrats, the legal deadline to put forward a new candidate had passed.
Never fear. The Democrats went to the friendly New Jersey Supreme Court and got a decision that allowed them to call the venerable Frank Lautenberg out of retirement and run in Torricellis stead. And, of course, the seat was saved.
For the second example we move to the Senate. Many readers will also remember the contretemps over George W. Bushs nomination of Miquel Estrada to the Washington DC district court in 2001. By all accounts, Estrada was supremely qualified to sit on that bench, but he spelled trouble for the Democrats. For one, he was conservative; for two, he was Latino; and for three, he may have been a White House choice for a future Supreme Court nomination.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The left has made an artform out of moving the goalposts.
That Toricelli/Lautenberg incident was egregious. But the New Jersey Supreme Court abetted the Democrats in flaunting the election laws, as did the Florida Supreme court during the frivolous Gore election challence of 2000, but even more evregiously.
Reid Democrat controlled Senate getting rid of the filibuster on judges worked great Dems!
Harry Reid changed the rule on confirming federal judges. That has worked out pretty well for Trump
I gotta learn to read all the posts before I post.... :)
THEY changed the rules. From an Atlantic column just days before Trump officially became President Trump: How Democrats Paved the Way for the Confirmation of Trump's Cabinet
An excerpt:
"...A little over three years ago, Senator Mitch McConnell stood on the Senate floor and issued a warning to the Democrats who then controlled the majority. I say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, youll regret this, McConnell, then the minority leader, told them. And you may regret it a lot sooner than you think. At the urging of Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrats had just voted along strict party lines to change the rules of the Senate, deploying what had become known in Washington as the nuclear option. McConnell and his Republican colleagues were furious. Under the new rules, presidential nominees for all executive-branch positionincluding the Cabinetand judicial vacancies below the Supreme Court could advance with a simple majority of 51 votes. The rules for legislation were untouched, but the 60-vote threshold for overcoming a filibuster on nearly all nominations was dead..."
THIS, just a couple of days before Trump came into office, outlines how delicious it is. They had no idea on the Left. They were all geared up for President Hillary. They were going to shove the most extreme, unpalatable, unprincipled, undesirable, anti-American, open-borders judicial nominees down our throats. They had slips of paper, already written out, sorted, starting with the worst, and were anticipating with joy and glee the cries of anger and frustration that would rightfully come from Conservatives.
They were planning to shove it down our throats with extreme prejudice and into other areas of conservative's bodies with no lubrication. They were fully prepared to say coolly to us in a Arkansas accent: "You better put some ice on that." They were already planning drinking parties for both cabinet and judicial nominees, where every time a conservative objected, they would have to take a drink, and everyone would have a great time. And we would be helpless.
Then something happened on the way to their Black Panther Party: Trump won.
They never saw it. And even in the lines of this leftist rag I took the excerpt from, even the dimmer bulbs could see what was coming. And even better...they knew...they KNEW that they did it to themselves. Republicans would have never, ever, in a million years changed that rule.
That is why we are always at a disadvantage to these unscrupulous scumbags during elections. Conservatives generally have to play by the rules, and it isn't in our DNA to cheat the way they do. They are at no such disadvantage, and conduct themselves according to the "Rules for Radicals" Alinsky Templates, and are not only unapologetic about it, take great glee, satisfaction, and pride in doing so.
Which makes that giant cow manure cigar blowing up in their collective faces with the accompanying howls of pain and protest all the more enjoyable.
What makes it EVEN BETTER?
The sure knowledge that not only does Trump enjoy it too, he relishes poking his finger in their collective eyes to accentuate their pain and anger.
This won't last forever. And when they come back into power, as they surely will someday, the only hope would be that they learned from their folly.
But that is a faint hope indeed. So we enjoy it while we can!
ALWAYS blame Trump for mishaps /s
When Ted Kennedy died, Romney was the MA gov., and the state Dem solons changed the law from vacant Congo seats to be filled by the gubernatorial appointment to a special election.
When BHO butt-buddy Coupe Deval Patrick became governor, the law was changed back.
A few elections back, MI congresscritter John Conyers missed the deadline for filing valid signatures for being on the ballot. The fix was in, and a couple of judges let it slide.
Considering I only beat you at my comment #4 over your #5 that might not have worked..
Its amazing how close yours was to mine.
#4 :”Reid Democrat controlled Senate getting rid of the filibuster on judges worked great Dems! “
#5 “Harry Reid changed the rule on confirming federal judges. That has worked out pretty well for Trump “
I saw the part of the Dems debate last night where most of them committed to getting rid of whats left of the filibuster.
This article merely reinforces the (now old) adage that “if it weren’t for double standards, Democrats would have no standards at all.”
LOL! So many time I’ve got my finger on that “post” button but decide to go back and read all of the thread, then I’m like “whew! glad I didn’t say that!”
They changed their debate rules (which are theirs to change and have nothing to do with Congressional rules) to FORCE him to debate. He did not want to debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.