You appear to be a somewhat thoughtful person tightly bound inside your own perspective. The result is you may have limited success completely relating to others.
NOW PLEASE PAY ATTENTON
YOU WROTE: "What if I’ve been a stepchild myself?"
I ask you. What possible good would it do for me to answer that question?
I asked you earlier, "why do you choose to characterize the Progressive as a stepchild?
In your time on earth have you found stepchildren to be of little or no quality?" You wrote: “Progressivism is like the spoiled, inept STEPCHILD who threatens to take over the farm of his upbringing and turn it into the crackhouse of his demise.”
Now just try to answer the question. Ready? Here is the question:
Why do you characterize the Progressive as a stepchild, a spoiled, inept STEPCHILD who threatens to take over the farm of his upbringing and turn it into the crackhouse of his demise?
Just answer that question, and don't try to avoid it by asking your inane question: "What if I’ve been a stepchild myself?"
Whether you are a stepchild has nothing to do with the question I asked you.
Why do you characterize the Progressive as a stepchild, a spoiled, inept STEPCHILD who threatens to take over the farm of his upbringing and turn it into the crackhouse of his demise?
Do you have a gripe about stepchildren?
And ....... if you indeed have been a stepchild yourself, do you have a deep sense of self-hatred?
If you do have that misguided sense, you shouldn't.
Attacking my “about page” comments is evidence that your primary agenda is to attack me, the person. I forgive you for it, though.
Now, as I point out, progressives are like a spoiled stepchild. Not stepchildren. Stepchild.
Why do you take one spoiled, crack-addicted stepchild and then assume all stepchildren are like that?
You seem to have something against all stepchildren.
(Maybe next time listen to your voices?)