Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanders releases list of how to pay for his proposals
The Hill ^ | February 24, 2020 | Justine Coleman

Posted on 02/25/2020 4:18:08 AM PST by karpov

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Monday night released a list of how he plans to pay for his proposals.

The presidential candidate announced during a CNN town hall Monday night that he planned to distinguish himself from President Trump and the promises the Trump campaign made in 2016 by posting to his website a detailed proposal on how to raise money for his plans.

The list published Monday details how the senator plans to pay for his big ticket promises like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal, in addition to smaller plans like Housing for All.

Sanders said he planned to raise $16.3 trillion for the Green New Deal to combat climate change.

The money would come from making the fossil fuel industry pay for “their pollution,” garnering profit from the wholesale of energy, decreasing defense spending, getting new income tax revenue and saving federal and state safety net spending from the jobs created in the plan and enforcing higher taxes on large corporations.

For the Medicare for All plan, Sanders said he plans to create a 4 percent income-based premium while exempting the first $29,000 in income for a family of four, requiring employers to pay a 7.5 percent income-based premium, getting rid of health tax expenditures and increasing the top marginal income tax to 52 percent on incomes over $10 million.

He also would tax capital gains at the same rates of income from wages, enact the For the 99.8% Act, reform the corporate tax system and use money from the tax on the extremely wealthy.

But CNN's Chris Cuomo said Sanders's plan for Medicare for All "is not matching the price tag" of the total estimated cost.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: berniesanders; fakescience; sanders; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: beancounter13
Any increase in taxes on corporations will automatically flow to the consumer so the middle class gets to pay for it. Any corporation that does not bake these costs into their pricing will go out of business.

Well if you are truly a deficit hawk then what's so bad about that? What so bad about a consumption tax? What's so bad about promoting domestic oil production ( jobs jobs jobs )? What so bad about lowering the trade deficit? I tariff on IMPORTED OIL will do all those things. WIN - WIN - WIN.

41 posted on 02/25/2020 6:21:20 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Well we do know the black market would definitely grow. Remember, the black market in the USSR?

Actually the black market is HUGE under our current system.


42 posted on 02/25/2020 6:21:45 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

2 words for Crazy Bernie: Laffer Curve.


43 posted on 02/25/2020 6:22:55 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
<>But CNN's Chris Cuomo said Sanders's plan for Medicare for All "is not matching the price tag" of the total estimated cost.

Fredo is smaaat.

44 posted on 02/25/2020 6:23:16 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
getting rid of health tax expenditures

What he means is eliminating the health care deduction. This is right from his website:

:"Eliminating health tax expenditures, which would no longer be needed under Medicare for All. (Revenue raised: About $3 trillion over 10 years.)"

What he means is we can't deduct the $90k in assisted living expenses which offset the $90k in IRA withdrawals needed to pay for assisted living. Obviously Medicaid-for-all is not going to cover dignified assisted living. It will instead include the current Medicaid-funded nursing homes i.e. "oxycontin warehousing for the almost-dead". FU BS and GTH.

45 posted on 02/25/2020 6:28:32 AM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways to Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Sanders proposed getting rid of medical debt by implementing an income inequality tax on large corporations that pay CEOs at least 50 times more than average workers.

Someone should explain to Bernie that CEOs get paid big money because they are worth more to the success of the company than the "average worker". Watch what happens to the company if you put an "average worker" into the CEO position. Bernie should put HIS money where his mouth is by giving away HIS salary to charity. He's rich, he won't miss that money.

46 posted on 02/25/2020 6:31:36 AM PST by Fresh Wind (The Electoral College is the firewall protecting us from massive blue state vote fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Let me be the first to send my portion of $10,000 to DC.

````
no need to send it in - it will be deducted from you pay check r bank account automatically - if you make or have less than $10K, it will be deducted from someone else’s account/paycheck. See simple socialism, easy and free


47 posted on 02/25/2020 6:38:44 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Again, you seem to have a very rosy outlook on government spending.

Why do you believe the federal government will EVER operate at a surplus long enough to pay down our national debt?

Why do you think a ‘tax on fossil fuels’ will be limited to ‘fossil fuels produced overseas’?

Your statements are illogical, and like the Bernie-bots, you seem to live in a fantasy world. Maybe you are just another Bernie-bot, too.


48 posted on 02/25/2020 6:43:04 AM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
wealth tax on the 0.1 percent, or those making more than $32 million.

A wealth tax is unconstitutional. It violates Article I, Section Nine, item 4.

49 posted on 02/25/2020 6:43:37 AM PST by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Punitive lawsuits and taxes against the oil and gas industry will absolutely cripple the industry, which is barely surviving as it is. Low prices right now are forcing companies to abandon plans to drill...it’s just not economic. The rig count continues to drop. Yes, Bernie’s actions will cause oil prices to go up, but at no gain for the companies. Look for gasoline, heating oil, and natural gas shortages coming your way. Socialist lines are on the way!


50 posted on 02/25/2020 6:46:51 AM PST by HopeSprings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I’ve read a few articles now, and the comments in this thread, and no one is picking up on probably the scariest idea in this barrel of madness. To partially pay for his Green New Deal, the second bullet in his plan reads as follows:

Generating $6.4 trillion in revenue from the wholesale of energy produced by the regional Power Marketing Administrations. This revenue will be collected from 2023-2035, and after 2035 electricity will be virtually free, aside from operations and maintenance costs.

Take careful note of “...energy produced by the regional Power Marketing Administrations.” Sanders is suggesting that he will nationalize (i.e., socialize) electrical power production in the US. It’s unclear from these scant details if he’s suggesting that private power utilities will be “bought up” by the government and then administered by his “Ministry of Power,” or if the power these privately held utilities produce will be controlled/distributed by a government “marketing administration.” Either way, this is a disaster waiting to happen for several reasons.


51 posted on 02/25/2020 6:47:33 AM PST by agatheringstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13

What does spending have to do with income? Nothing. As a bean counter you should know better.


52 posted on 02/25/2020 6:49:56 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: karpov

It is now once again time for the classic from Bill Whittle entitled “Eat the Rich”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ

The “rich” don’t have anywhere near enough money to pay for these schemes.


53 posted on 02/25/2020 6:50:35 AM PST by agatheringstorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Yep, the Senior Advisor for the Bloomberg Campaign just went there... pic.twitter.com/7Rqx2uVX9n— M3thods (@M2Madness) February 25, 2020


54 posted on 02/25/2020 6:50:36 AM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.cuase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

Crater the economy.


55 posted on 02/25/2020 7:10:46 AM PST by headstamp 2 (There's a stairway to heaven, but there's also a highway to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Spending and income are related. Since you mentioned being a deficit hawk, I thought you would have understood that.


56 posted on 02/25/2020 7:25:55 AM PST by beancounter13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The Dems are a train wreck. They are all attacking Sanders and generating reams of material for President Trump to use against him in the fall. Bloomberg may well damage Sanders, but his own ineptness makes it unlikely he will get the nomination - even with his billions. Biden appears to be one step away from full dementia. Butt boy can’t win the black vote.


57 posted on 02/25/2020 7:29:12 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: beancounter13
Spending and income are related.

In this case, federal spending, Congress doesn't care one wit about income. They set spending regardless of revenue projection. The two are completely decoupled.

Tariffs raise revenue and closes the deficit gap. All of you deficit hawks should be wildly in favor of them. Or continue to be hypocrites.

58 posted on 02/25/2020 7:30:47 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour

Have you seen the side-by-side vid of Buttedge imitating 0bama, exactly? Same pause in words, same body positions, etc.

What a fool....it looks like he spent hours, in front of a mirror, practicing how to be 0.


59 posted on 02/25/2020 7:31:04 AM PST by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.cuase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: karpov

There should be some kind of “Bernieland” simulation where anyone considering voting for him/similar, has to do pratical things throughout the course of a day in a world where he was President (i.e. file a tax return, get gas if cars even still exist, etc). Or maybe someone can devise some documentary of such a thing and air it primetime. Too many people have no concept of what his proposals would equate to.


60 posted on 02/25/2020 7:44:05 AM PST by Moonlighter (TRiUMPh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson