Posted on 02/21/2020 8:51:22 AM PST by yesthatjallen
“”If they didn’t sign it how do they know whose it was?””
Good question. Maybe they were numbered?
This may be deliberate, so when Trump crushes the RAT candidate in November they can call the results into question.
Iowa's 🐘s Caucus 1.0 worked perfectly.
Now, Nevada's 🐀s are calling theirs another caucus, but they are allowing early voting?? I don 't think they know what a 'caucus' is. It's a live meeting during which attendees vote. How can there be absentee 'voting' days before 'caucus?' Sounds like a primary to me. And then I suppose they'll do their convoluted calculations before determining how many delegates are awarded (not to Bernie.) All the while continuing to whine that Hillary was robbed after "winning the popular vote."
Maybe they handed out ballots without a signature of the recipient but the poll worker initialed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.