Posted on 02/20/2020 1:25:28 PM PST by yoe
A federal judge issued a permanent injunction against the Border Patrol's Tucson Sector on Wednesday, telling the agency that it cannot hold migrants, including families with children, for longer than 48 hours.
In his 40-page decision, U.S. District Judge David C. Bury ruled the conditions at the sector's eight stations are "presumptively punitive and violate the Constitution," and he blocked Border Patrol and parent agency U.S. Customs and Border Protection from holding people who have been processed by agents for more than 48 hours from "book-in time."
"Detention may not extend into a third night under the 'no longer than 48 hours' rule until CBP can provide conditions of confinement that meet detainees' basic human needs for sleeping in a bed with a blanket, a shower, food that meets acceptable dietary standards, potable water, and medical assessment performed by a medical professional," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at tucsonsentinel.com ...
So does letting them go.
It should take no more than 47 hours to take them to the border and fling them back across with a trebuchet.
“The forced releasing is unreasonable.”
I suggest force releasing them to Mexican immigration at one of the Mexican border entry points.
Bus them out of the Tucson Sector before the 48 hours are up, and until this jackwagon can be overturned on appeal.
Ship them back across the border.
Must be the version that Kenyans from Indonesia can be President under.
“He may be referring to someone else’s Constitution.”
They always are.
I thought W said that he would only nominate “strict constructionists”.
I am not surprised though. Whatever W claimed to be, he turned out to be a McGovern liberal in many ways.
What did we do to him, that we need to be victimized by these hordes of illegal alien invaders?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We disrupted the Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA), the largest bipartisan project of the last 30 years, by electing President Trump.
We're weren't buying into it.
In truth, we're probably farther in than we suspect.
Bush was holding yearly meetings on the incorporation of the NAU.
He wanted to let down our northern and southern borders and only have
protection around the perimeter of three nations. We refused to
protect our own border, so who thinks we would have protected that
three nation border?
I consider Bush a demoncRat much of the time, in his quest for globalism.
Drop them off at his house.
Because he IS a Federal Judge.
He cannot legislate, the law says what it does.
Enforce the law, judge can get stuffed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.