Posted on 02/19/2020 10:10:55 AM PST by Kaslin
Bloomberg is rising in polls and just qualified for the debate stage in Nevada, but a question nags: who really wants Bloomberg to be president?
Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s massive campaign spending—hundreds of millions of dollars and counting—appears to be paying off. One poll this week showed Bloomberg tied with Sen. Bernie Sanders in Virginia, each with 22 percent, and after garnering 19 percent in a national poll released Tuesday, Bloomberg has qualified for the Democratic presidential debate tonight in Las Vegas.
At first glance Bloomberg’s poll surge suggests the New York billionaire has a real shot at challenging Sanders, the current Democratic frontrunner, for the nomination. That in turn has prompted some pundits, including my colleague David Marcus, to speculate on whether Bloomberg should be taken seriously—not just as a contender for the Democratic nomination, but for the White House.
Don’t let these new polls lead you astray. Not only is Mike Bloomberg not going to be president, he almost certainly isn’t even going to be the Democratic nominee.
Why? For one thing, polls can only tell us so much (just ask Joe Biden). But the most straightforward reason is that much of politics is about charisma and likeability, and Bloomberg is excruciatingly bland and unlikeable. In that way he’s like an anti-Trump—a male version of Hillary Clinton, or a Joe Biden with all the baggage and none of the charm.
Consider one version of the pro-Bloomberg argument, that he’s a no-nonsense billionaire who can get things done. He’s even more successful than Trump!
This misapprehends Trump’s appeal. Trump didn’t just bring a billionaire businessman persona to the 2016 election, he brought charisma and an entire media brand. He was a household name, a TV celebrity and an entertainer in his own right, and had been for decades.
Trump could dismiss CNN and MSNBC because he personally had a bigger platform than those outlets. Millions of Americans didn’t just know him as a successful businessman but also as a showman and an entertainer who is good, if not great, with a crowd—funny and even weirdly charming at times.
Bloomberg has none of that. Until recently, most Americans likely knew him as the New York City mayor who tried to ban Big Gulps. Before long, they’ll know him as the billionaire who bought his way into the Democratic primary, or as the guy who couldn’t explain the information economy without insulting farmers and factory workers, or explain health care without arguing it’s a waste to give health care to old people. Or maybe as the boss who told a female employee to kill her baby.
Style and personality aside, Bloomberg’s candidacy has no coherent narrative, a fact attested to by his almost comically vapid campaign slogan, “Mike will get it done,” as meaningless and uninspiring as “Make America Great Again” is brilliant. Get what done, Mike? A soda ban?
The absence of a rationale for his campaign stems from the plain fact that in the current scheme of American politics, a socially liberal fiscal conservative like Bloomberg has no natural constituency. Think of it this way. Trump has more or less reshaped the GOP into a socially conservative, fiscally liberal party. (For all intents and purposes, fiscal conservatism has no home in American politics right now. You don’t pass a $1-trillion-and-a-half tax cut and then run up a $1-trillion-and-a-half deficit and still get to call yourself a fiscal conservative.)
On the other side, the increasingly socialist post-Obama Democratic Party is both socially and fiscally liberal. Sanders, for example, wants to spend he doesn’t even know how many trillions on universal health care and socialized college, along with whatever other spending a Green New Deal might call for. The other leading Democratic candidates are more or less on board with this, as they must be in a party now ruled by identity politics and the promise of free stuff.
Bloomberg doesn’t fit in either camp. His appeal is to the socially liberal, fiscally conservative voter—an increasingly rare species in American politics but one that nevertheless preferred Trump over Clinton in 2016. So far, Bloomberg hasn’t been on a single ballot or earned a single vote. His momentum, such as it is, consists mostly in social media ads and media hype.
Maybe, as my colleague Christopher Bedford has argued, Bloomberg isn’t really running for president, and his campaign is really just a super PAC masquerading as a campaign to buy him influence over the eventual nominee. At this point, that would make more sense than the idea of a candidate who repels almost every category of voter having a serious shot at the White House, let alone the Democratic nomination.
Or maybe it’s worse than that. Maybe the point of “Mike can get it done” is nothing more than a meaningless, astronomically expensive exercise in vanity.
Bloomberg: 78
Biden: 77
Sanders: 78
Half the field could keel over en masse at the next debate - then where would the Democrats be?
Didn't somebodies say that four years ago?
“...then where would the Democrats be?”
Hillary: Only 72. (lol)
who really wants Bloomberg
The DNC who will do anything to stop Bernie.
The author may be right, but I don’t believe Sanders will be the nominee either. It seems as if it’s becoming increasingly likely the dem convention will be brokered in the first round.
So, when the super delegates step in, and other delegates have been released of their obligations of the first round, who will they turn to?
Mooch: 56
Don't kid yourself. She may say she doesn't want to be POTUS, but in reality it would be the perfect opportunity for her to exact punishment on all things whitey.
One of these candidates has got to be nominated. I don’t think Bloomberg’s chances are less than the others.
Anyone can be a president. You make a podium. You stand behind it. You dig a hole. Throw some dirt on him. And a president grows.
> Half the field could keel over en masse at the next debate - then where would the Democrats be? <
Chelsea Clinton is over 35, so she’s eligible now.
“....then where would the Democrats be?”
Buttgig: 38. His campaign slogan ought to be....
“Vote for Me. I’m young, dumb and full of....”
Many Democrats in Virginia are strongly in favor of gun control. They will support Bloomberg for this reason.
But most Virginians are not in favor of gun control, and Bloomberg would lose in the general election for this very same reason.
What a waste of money. He could have changed so many lives for the better, granted last wishes, donated to various charities, etc. Sad.
Donald trump is not going to be the President or even the Reppublican Nominee.
Didn’t somebodies say that four years ago?
Agree. It troubles when GOP act like Democrats: Make statements like Bloomberg will never be, trust polls, etc.
They COULD trout out that loudmouth, Big Mo “O” and that would take the wind out of everyone’s sails.
Did you ever wonder why she’s stayed away from the flag pole and kept her big stupid mouth shut?
"... not choose to run".
He had to know he was never going to get in. I wonder what he’s really up to?
In the end, He will be the poster child for why we don’t need campaign finance reform. Once spending reaches a certain point, money really doesn’t matter much, if at all.
Yeah low energy, well- funded Jeb Bush was the consensus nominee. It all ended in NH when the voters got a chance to give their opinion. I see Bloomberg as Bush, not Trump. Money can’t buy you love.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.