Posted on 02/11/2020 12:53:24 PM PST by karpov
Can presidential electors vote for any candidate they choose? Or must they vote for the candidate who won their states’ popular votes? These questions long have remained unresolved, but now the Supreme Court will tackle the issue.
Anti-Electoral College activists want the decision to work in their favor.
If the Supreme Court holds that electors are free agents who can vote their conscience, these activists hope for panic, discontent and outrage. They hope that voters will be scared into giving them what they’ve always wanted: a constitutional amendment eliminating the Electoral College.
Don’t fall for it. However the court rules, the Electoral College is far more stable than its detractors will acknowledge.
The appeal before the Supreme Court originated from two cases: In Washington, a court held that presidential electors can be required to vote in a certain way or be fined. The 10th Circuit disagreed, holding that electors can vote their conscience.
Presidential electors are elected officials, just as members of Congress are. None of these officials can be booted from office when they break a promise to their constituents. Voters’ recourse is to elect someone new the next time.
If the Supreme Court agrees with the 10th Circuit, is this cause for panic? Will everything change? Will electors begin voting at random, or can we still count on electors to vote in accordance with their own states’ outcomes?
More than 200 years of experience proves the Electoral College can be trusted.
As a matter of history, the “problem” of faithless electors has been mostly theoretical. Of the nearly 24,000 electoral votes cast since 1789, fewer than 30 of these votes have been indisputably cast contrary to voter expectations.
The first of these electors, in 1796, changed his vote to satisfy his own state.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
The Left is looking for a civil war any way they can.
Historically, there have been few faithless electors.
Realistically, the electors who are elected by us voters, are all party activists in whichever political party they are members of. And it’s unlikely a critical number would ever buck the party line.
This coming court case could be a preview of what could happen, if the states which want to have an interstate compact of states, which pledge their electors to the winner of the popular vote, ever is enacted by enough states to take effect.
Hate the Founders
Hate the Constitution
Hate all our Founding Documents
Hate the Nation’s founding principles
Hate our immigration laws
Hate that we have a border
Hate the Electoral College
Who could have guessed?
yes
Electors are party loyalists and not likely to give their vote to the other party.
Two GOP defectors in 2016 vs. five from the Hildebeast. Both GOP defectors were from Texas. The witch had four from Washington and one from Hawaii.
Wanna see real chaos: What if the national vote comes within 1% or less and we have to recount the nation?
They learned all that from the most popular US history textbook used in schools - “A People’s History of the United States”, by Howard Zinn, an America hater.
Remember how the Electors were treated by the Leftists when Trump won?
Thanks. I’ve heard the name, but didn’t know him or his textbook.
It’s simply amazing that nobody holding a public office challenges this.
Two voting to steal from the third is not in the Constitution.
Even if they manage to destroy the electoral college, the dems will still lose. How many repubs in California, New York, Oregon, Washington, Massachusetts, etc don’t even bother to vote anymore, knowing that their states are utterly impossible to prevail in.
They assume the voting total of 2016 would be the same if it was not an electoral system. That’s pure folly.
Can't happen.
It's not one national vote. It's 50 state votes. You'd only recount the states that are within 1%, if that's what is in their individual election law.
-PJ
The public school system has been infiltrated for half a century with Communists. Zinn's text is very popular with the Left. Basically, it says that the US is illegal.
Thanks for the mention.
Yep.
Remember, the 2000 presidential election was 271-269. If there had been 2 faithless electors Al Gore would’ve been president.
Makes me wonder why the app was created.
Hate America Hate Americans
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.