Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Hampshire Democrats Are Worried About Beating Trump, And They Should Be.
The Federalist ^ | February 10, 2020 | John Daniel Davidson

Posted on 02/10/2020 7:17:43 AM PST by Kaslin

Granite State Democrats desperately want to pick a candidate who can beat Trump, but they’re not sure anyone on the primary ballot can do it.


MANCHESTER, New Hampshire — It would be easy to mistake the feverish activity in New Hampshire over the past week for excitement. The state has been abuzz with Democratic presidential campaign events, armies of canvassers knocking on doors, curious voters from neighboring states coming to get a look at the candidates, and here in Manchester, swarms of reporters and camera crews.

But when you talk to voters, the overarching feeling isn’t excitement or optimism, but anxiety. Having gotten a close look at the candidates, Granite State Democrats are worried none of them can beat Trump.

They have good reason to worry. Between his powerful State of the Union address, the impeachment acquittal, rising approval ratings, and the Democratic debacle in Iowa, last week was arguably the best of Trump’s presidency. The economy is strong, approval of the Republican Party is the highest it’s been since 2005, and the two Democratic frontrunners are a 78-year-old avowed socialist and a gay 38-year-old former mayor of a small midwestern city.

All of this has not escaped the notice of New Hampshire primary voters, who go to the polls tomorrow in the first presidential primary election of 2020. That’s one reason so many of them I spoke to just days before the election were still undecided.

At an Elizabeth Warren campaign stop in Derry last week, I spoke with three New Hampshire women, Mary Bishop, her sister Nancy, and their friend Sue Dickinson. They were so shocked and disturbed by Trump’s election in 2016 that they decided to get involved and see as many candidates as possible this year, and they’ve seen them all. “The important thing is to pick the person who can beat Trump,” says Nancy. “It isn’t clear yet who that is.”

This was typical of what I heard again and again from voters. Whether it was concern over Bernie Sanders’ radical views, worries about Pete Buttigieg’s youth and inexperience, or misgivings about Joe Biden’s general baggage and lack of energy, everyone had qualms—even about their top choices.

It’s not just New Hampshire Democrats who feel this way. I spoke with three friends, retirees living in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey, who traveled to New Hampshire together for a kind of candidate-scouting trip. I ask them how they feel about the Democratic field in general, after having seen all the candidates in person. There’s a pause as they glance at one another. Then one of them, Jonathan Hayes, a retired executive from Southport, Connecticut, says, “We’re nervous.”

“We haven’t seen anyone who can beat Trump,” says his friend John Stockton, a retired attorney from Harrison, New York. What about Mayor Pete? “He’s bloodless,” says Hayes. What about Joe Biden? “He’s not even here, he’s got no signs, no presence,” says Stockton. The third friend, Henry Van Kohorn from Princeton, New Jersey, nods silently in agreement. None of the candidates, says Hayes, has the kind of “rockstar” energy Obama had, and that concerns them.

Despite Media Enthusiasm, the Democratic Field Is Weak

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. The 2020 Democratic presidential field was supposed to be the most talented, diverse, and accomplished group of candidates we’d ever seen. For more than a year the media assured us that it was, even as the candidates’ manifest weaknesses became more apparent. Many of those who seemed so promising early on—Beto O’Rourke, Julian Castro, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker—dropped out one by one before Iowa, victims of their own awkward leftward lurches and woke pandering.

And then came Iowa, where the putative frontrunner, Biden, simply collapsed. Biden came in a distant fourth, earning barely 15 percent of the vote in a caucus with lower than expected turnout. It was confirmation of what should have been obvious from the beginning: Biden is a terrible candidate who might not make it through the primaries.

Despite leading in most polls over the last year—probably as result of name recognition more than anything else—he has displayed a remarkable lack of energy on the campaign trail and a growing penchant for gaffes and lashing out at voters. (On Sunday, he called a woman who asked a tough question about Iowa a “lying, dog-faced pony soldier.”)

Complaints about Biden seem to be ubiquitous among voters in both Iowa and New Hampshire. One self-described working-class man I spoke to said he couldn’t believe it when Biden told a roomful of people the economy is only working for the top 1 percent, not the working class.

Another man, a Sierra Club volunteer I spoke to in Manchester, said his wife voted for Biden by absentee ballot because she’ll be out of town for Tuesday’s primary, but she immediately regretted her vote when the Iowa results came in. A 23-year-old black woman told me she won’t vote for Biden because of his treatment of Anita Hill in 1991, and that she doesn’t believe his apology.

No wonder I didn’t meet a single Biden supporter in Iowa aside from one poorly attended campaign stop.

As Biden fell, Buttigieg surged, basically fighting Sanders to a draw in Iowa (Buttigieg narrowly edged out Sanders in the delegate count while Sanders beat Buttigieg in the popular vote). His unexpectedly good showing brought a polling and fundraising boost. On Friday, Buttigieg said his campaign had raised more than $4 million in as many days, and his polls numbers have been rising, with one New Hampshire poll showing him in within the margin of error versus Sanders.

Buttigieg is now styling himself as the reasonable alternative to leftists like Sanders and Warren in an attempt to fill the moderate lane that once seemed to have room only for Biden. Indeed, Biden’s candidacy forced out a slew of actual moderates like former Maryland Rep. John Delany, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio, and former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, all of whom failed to gain traction in Biden’s shadow.

The irony is that Buttigieg is no moderate. On nearly every issue, from health care to abortion to immigration, the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, is far to the left of both Biden and Barack Obama. He also wants to abolish the Electoral College and, unlike the farther-left Sanders, pack the Supreme Court. But of course the media won’t cover Buttigieg as anything but a moderate, as if citing religion to justify late-term abortions of disabled children somehow fits that description.

For now, Buttigieg might be able to hide his radicalism behind meaningless verbiage (see below) but in a general election it would become increasingly difficult to pass himself off as a moderate, especially among more socially conservative black voters.

Indeed, his unpopularity with black voters might be Buttigieg’s biggest liability as the Democratic nominee. As a Politico report noted recently, Buttigieg has spent millions over the past six weeks advertising in South Carolina, where a majority of Democrats are black, but has failed to increase his poll numbers there, hovering at 2 percent support among black voters—about the same as his support among black Democrats nationally.

#CNNTownHall pic.twitter.com/lt4yVD7Krz

— Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) February 7, 2020

Bernie Sanders Is Haunting The Democratic Primary

Buttigieg’s momentum notwithstanding, the most likely headline to emerge from the New Hampshire primary is a Sanders win. The Vermont senator won the 2016 primary here by 22 points and has consistently led in polls (RealClearPolitics polling average shows Sanders with a 4.8-point lead in the state).

In that case, the Sanders campaign will claim back-to-back victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, setting up for a strong showing in Nevada, where the Democratic electorate is heavily working class and Hispanic, and tends to be influenced by the results of Iowa and New Hampshire.

More so than any other Democratic contender, Sanders has worked hard on Hispanic outreach, which might play a decisive role as the primary season drags on. In Iowa, his campaign was sending out Spanish-language literature to Hispanic voters as early as last July, and while Sanders was stuck in Washington for the impeachment trial, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was stumping for him in Iowa. Mitch Henry, the former political director for the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and a Democratic precinct chair in Des Moines, told me political engagement among Iowa’s Hispanic population has exploded.

“It’s all because of Sanders’ outreach,” he says. “And when you have someone like AOC advocating, that just draws people in like nothing else.”

If Sanders pulls off a win in both New Hampshire and Nevada, he’ll be the undisputed frontrunner heading into South Carolina, where Biden will more or less have to win, and win decisively, to keep raising money and stay in the race.

This of course scares the daylights out of Democratic Party leaders, whose feelings about a Sanders nomination were best summed up by longtime Democratic strategist James Carville last week, first in a rant on MSNBC that went viral and then a follow-up interview with Vox.

WATCH: James Carville has some thoughts about what is happening in Iowa, and across the country, for Democrats. pic.twitter.com/W9KuEeFvcO

— MSNBC (@MSNBC) February 5, 2020

“We have candidates on the debate stage talking about open borders and decriminalizing illegal immigration,” Carville told Vox. “They’re talking about doing away with nuclear energy and fracking. You’ve got Bernie Sanders talking about letting criminals and terrorists vote from jail cells. It doesn’t matter what you think about any of that, or if there are good arguments — talking about that is not how you win a national election. It’s not how you become a majoritarian party.”

Later, Carville called Sanders an “ideologue” who’s “never been a Democrat.” Democrat or not, Sanders is poised to become the frontrunner in a still-crowded primary field. Usually, a winnowing takes place after Iowa, but the ensuing chaos and days-long wait to get a final vote tally from the Iowa Democratic Party ensured that no one, not even Andrew Yang, who got only 1 percent, dropped out before New Hampshire.

So who will save the Democrats from Sanders? Billionaire Mike Bloomberg would like Democratic voters to know he’s waiting in the wings. The day after Iowa, encouraged by the muddled results, he announced he was doubling his ad spending in Super Tuesday states, having already spent north of $300 million, and doubling his campaign staff to 2,000. In an ironic twist, it could be that in its desperation to avoid a Sanders nomination, the Democratic National Committee turns to a Wall Street billionaire with no natural constituency who only decided to run for president three months ago because he wasn’t impressed with the field.

New Hampshire Democrats won’t get to weigh in on Bloomberg, not yet anyway. They’ve got enough to consider as it is. To hear them tell it, the fate of the country rests on their decision here Tuesday. They feel like they have to get it right, they have to pick the candidate who can beat Trump. With the hours to primary day ticking down, many of them still don’t know who that might be.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2020democratprimary; andrewyang; berniesanders; fauxtahonawarren; iowacaucuses; jamescarville; joebiden; nhprimary; petebuttigieg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2020 7:17:43 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

None of them have a chance to beat Trump. Another Obama isn’t waiting in the wings to save the Democrats.

This is a dress rehearsal for 2024.


2 posted on 02/10/2020 7:26:22 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
NH Democrats desperately want a candidate who can beat Trump, but they’re not sure anyone on the primary ballot can do it.

Spit.....they cant see the forest for the trees.

Democraps ill-conceived impeachment hoax, hopelessly carried-out by House morons is the be-all and end-all of their problem.

The Dems seem to think no one was paying attention to the sophomoric House goings-on....but them.

They didnt learn when Hillary called us "deplorables" ........like only her crowd heard her?

3 posted on 02/10/2020 7:26:51 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"...armies of canvassers knocking on doors..."

Don't knock on my door and get off my lawn!


4 posted on 02/10/2020 7:31:17 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What about Joe Biden? He’s not even here.

LOL... even though that’s not the way she meant it.


5 posted on 02/10/2020 7:38:44 AM PST by Conserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Pete’s dad, Joseph is a communist professor at Notre Dame south Bend.

Do a search. Save everything you can find now because like Obama things are being taken down.
Also look into the software company the ran IOWA and Connections to Pete.
He stole that election. And would do the same against Trump. He has no morals and is a puppet.


6 posted on 02/10/2020 7:40:36 AM PST by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

READY - AIM - VOTE

It’s the best way to eliminate the criminal pandemic in the republic.

DEPOPULATE ‘rats and rinos. They carry deadly viruses.


7 posted on 02/10/2020 7:46:38 AM PST by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

-—”A 23-year-old black woman told me she won’t vote for Biden because of his treatment of Anita Hill in 1991, and that she doesn’t believe his apology.”-—

This is the perfect racialist woke Dem voter. Wasn’t even alive when this horrible transgression supposedly happened, can’t see any other issues, and Biden is forever canceled because of it.


8 posted on 02/10/2020 7:48:35 AM PST by StoneRainbow68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The article is better than most, but it manages to ignore Butt-man’s sexual perversion. That is particularly important since it is the reason for Butt-man’s terrible poll numbers in the black community.

It is time for any article to just tell the truth, politically incorrect or not, just tell the truth.


9 posted on 02/10/2020 7:49:55 AM PST by cgbg (The Democratic Party is morphing into the Donner Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

[What about Joe Biden? “He’s not even here, he’s got no signs, no presence,” says Stockton. ]


Biden has enough cash to make a dent. What he needs is someone like Axelrod to run his political operation. But for some reason, he hasn’t hired someone like that. And his current operation resembles his Senate runs, where he basically schmoozed local constituents into voting for him. At presidential level and at his age, he can’t possibly do that. And he’s not doing that. It looks like the unthinkable is becoming reality - that Biden could crash out of this race.


10 posted on 02/10/2020 7:59:03 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As James Woods so aptly put it:

“Just for giggles, imagine this: the #IowaCauscuses were not a snafu, but an engineered “cluster muck” to keep the #Democrat field wide open. The #ImpeachmentSham was a way to air Biden’s corruption. The chaos leads to a brokered convention. Guess which drunken hag saves the day?”


11 posted on 02/10/2020 7:59:08 AM PST by mkleesma (`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
This is a dress rehearsal for 2024.

A dress rehearsal usually includes the actual performers, not a bunch of stand-ins. Who do the dems have for 2024? Petey has no path to improve his resume in the next 4 years, in Indiana or nationally. Kamala Harris will be the same person she was in 2019. Robert Francis O'Rourke? He's got the same path as Petey.

And by 2024, Warren, Sanders, Biden and Bloomberg will be pushing 80, or already there. That leaves AOC, and her gang in the House. And AOC can inherit Sanders' supporters, but will she have any support beyond that? Another sheltered California Dem will flame out nationally.

Bottom line, the dem farm system is starting from scratch.

12 posted on 02/10/2020 7:59:10 AM PST by Bernard ("I don't know if that's true:" Schiff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Yeah, Buttigieg is simply an idenity politics pick, but I seriously doubt his sexual perference will/would work the same way Obama’s race did.


13 posted on 02/10/2020 8:00:41 AM PST by goodolemr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I heard an interview on NPR this AM,can’t remember who,and he virtually said the same thing.Lots of Trump people around.......and I have a son who is one of them.


14 posted on 02/10/2020 8:03:34 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"It wasn’t supposed to be this way. The 2020 Democratic presidential field was supposed to be the most talented, diverse, and accomplished group of candidates we’d ever seen."

To the author of this article, apparently blinded by TDS, it was the "most talented, diverse, and accomplished group of candidates we’d ever seen."

15 posted on 02/10/2020 8:06:57 AM PST by chief lee runamok (expect nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“We have candidates on the debate stage talking about open borders and decriminalizing illegal immigration,” Carville told Vox. “They’re talking about doing away with nuclear energy and fracking. You’ve got Bernie Sanders talking about letting criminals and terrorists vote from jail cells. It doesn’t matter what you think about any of that, or if there are good arguments — talking about that is not how you win a national election. It’s not how you become a majoritarian party.”

Translation: These idiots are blowing it! They're not lying about their real intentions! We only win when we pretend we like "freedom" and all that crap! We only win when we lie! Lie, dammit, lie!

16 posted on 02/10/2020 8:07:12 AM PST by workerbee (America finally has an American president again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Tweedledee or Tweedledum, that is a question much on the minds of the New Hampshire Democrat primary voters.

It just doesn’t make a whole lot of difference at this point in the game.

Flip a coin, write in a name, or simply vote “None of the above” on your ballot.

It is wasted any way you cut it.


17 posted on 02/10/2020 8:07:59 AM PST by alloysteel (Freedom is not a matter of life and death. It is much more serious than that..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
One of the things they have to fear is this...

The Speaker, NastyNan 'th Ripper dishonors the heroes President Trump introduced during the SOTU speech. Is NastyNan a felon?

18 U.S. Code § 2071. Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

U.S. Code
Notes

prev | next

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

Pelosi deserves immediate removal from the Speakership.

18 posted on 02/10/2020 8:09:03 AM PST by yoe (Want to HELP the Slave Trade and Drug Cartels in USA? Vote democrat........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkleesma

Bloomberg is their fall back candidate... Not Hillary. She has been effectively cancelled by all except Democrats.


19 posted on 02/10/2020 8:13:53 AM PST by JerseyDvl ("If you're going through hell, keep going.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Read my lips folks...The Democrat Party is dying politically...sent to the political death chamber by Democrats, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler. Schumer, Waters, AOC and her band of Democrat female America haters.

If the Democrat voters in New Hampshire have any street smarts” & common sense, at all, tomorrow, they will either stay home and not vote or, they will vote, by casting their votes by the write-in for POTUS, Donald J. Trump!!! Case Closed!!!


20 posted on 02/10/2020 8:15:10 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forev er!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson