Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Impeachment Failed
Townhall.com ^ | February 7, 2020 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 02/07/2020 4:48:20 AM PST by Kaslin

It's comforting, no doubt, to believe that Donald Trump has survived the impeachment trial because he possesses a tighter hold on his party than did Barack Obama or George W. Bush or any other contemporary president. In truth, Trump, often because of his own actions, has engendered less loyalty than the average president.

It's difficult to recall, after all, a single Democratic senator throwing anything but hosannas Obama's way, which allowed the former president to ride his high horse from one scandalous attack on the Constitution to the next. In 1998, no Democrat voted to convict Bill Clinton, who had engaged in wrongdoing for wholly self-serving reasons, despite the GOP's case being far more methodical and incriminating.

The chances of any party removing its sitting president without overwhelming evidence that fuels massive voter pressure are negligible. It's never happened in American history -- unless you count the preemptive removal of Richard Nixon -- and probably never will. Democrats are demanding the GOP adopt standards that no party has ever lived by.

Perhaps if the public hadn't been subjected to four years of interminable hysteria over the United States' imaginary descent into fascism, it might have been less apathetic toward the fate of "vital" Ukrainian aid that most Democrats had voted against when Obama was president.

And perhaps if institutional media hadn't spent three years pushing a hyperbolically paranoid narrative of Russian collusion -- a debunked conspiracy theory incessantly repeated by Democrats during the impeachment trial -- the public wouldn't be anesthetized to another alleged national emergency.

You simply can't expect a well-adjusted voter to maintain CNN-levels of indignation for years on end.

Beyond the public's mood, the Democrats' strategy was a mess. House Dems and their 17 witnesses set impossible-to-meet expectations, declaring that Trump had engaged in the worst wrongdoing ever committed by any president in history. (I'm not exaggerating.) When it comes to Trump criticism, everything is always "the worst thing ever!"

Even if Trump's actions had risen to the level of removal, Adam Schiff and Jerrold Nadler were terrible messengers to make the case. These are not the politicians you tap to persuade jurors; they're the politicians you pick to rile up your base.

Despite all the fabricated praise directed at Schiff over the past couple of weeks, the man reeks of partisanship. Not only because he's been caught lying about the presence of damning evidence against Trump on more than one occasion, but because he played a sketchy role in helping the whistleblower responsible for sparking the impeachment come forward.

Even then, instead of spending the appropriate time building a solid case, subpoenaing all the "vital" witnesses, and laying out a timeline, House Democrats, by their own admission, rushed forward. They justified taking shortcuts by warning that the country was in a race to stop Trump from stealing the 2020 election just as he had allegedly stolen the 2016 election.

That wouldn't have been a big deal if Nancy Pelosi hadn't exposed the supposed need for urgency as a ruse, by withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate for weeks. She did so despite having zero standing to dictate the terms of the trial, no constitutional right to attempt to dictate them and no political leverage. In the end, she got nothing from Mitch McConnell for her trouble.

Meanwhile, Democrats had spent most of the House hearings focusing on difficult-to-prove specific criminal offenses of "bribery" and "extortion" -- poll-tested words that were taken up after the House realized "quid pro quo" didn't play as well with the public.

Then, they didn't even bother including the "crimes" -- no, you don't need a violation of criminal law to impeach, but the word was incessantly used by House Dems anyway -- in their open-ended articles of impeachment, written expressly to compel Senate Republicans to investigate for them.

The House had no right to demand that, and the Senate had no reason to comply. So as soon as the upper chamber took up impeachment, Democrats began dropping one "bombshell" leak after the next -- the same strategy they deployed during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings -- to drag out the spectacle and maximize the political damage.

Some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans concede Trump's call was unbecoming and, in parts, inappropriate, even if it didn't rise to the level of an impeachable offense. But Democrats keep demanding that Republicans play under a different set of rules.

The Constitution, a document under attack by the very people claiming to save it from the president, worked exactly as it should. The House is free to subpoena all the "vital" witnesses Republicans have supposedly ignored, and then send a new batch of impeachment articles. Impeachment isn't tantamount to a "coup" any more than Senate acquittal is unconstitutional or corrupt.

Pretending that democracy is on the precipice of extinction simply because you didn't get your way, though, is nothing but histrionics.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 116th; acquittal; impeachmentinquiry; miserablefailure; nancypelousi; speakerpelosi; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2020 4:48:20 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans concede Trump's call was unbecoming and, in parts, inappropriate, ...

B.S. In PDJT's words "it was a perfect call".

2 posted on 02/07/2020 4:56:00 AM PST by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Even if Trump's actions had risen to the level of removal,

If?!!! Stopped right there. Trump did nothing wrong. Stop with the hypotheticals please.

3 posted on 02/07/2020 4:56:29 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

There’s nothing inappropriate about:

“We’ve got the former Veep here bragging in public that he strong-armed you guys. Any truth to that?”


4 posted on 02/07/2020 4:57:36 AM PST by StoneRainbow68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Same reason the effort to prosecute the Duke Lacrosse players failed.


5 posted on 02/07/2020 4:58:01 AM PST by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t agree with the author. I don’t think Trump did anything wrong, and I read the transcript. In fact, I think he was doing his job. The POTUS is responsible to uphold treaties and US Government employees who violate these treaties should be investigated. Joe Biden had a prosecutor fired because he said he was corrupt. What corruption was he referring to? Is that the event wherein 1.8 billion of US taxpayer money was given to a bank in Ukraine, that enriched local Oligarchs, was kicked back to politicians via their children in the US, and paid for George Soros continued attack on our country by laundering the money via multiple banks and Crowdstrike?

Maybe someone needs to investigate a little before they say Trump was NOT doing his job.


6 posted on 02/07/2020 5:00:08 AM PST by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Pretending that democracy is on the precipice of extinction simply because you didn't get your way, though, is nothing but histrionics.

I disagree. It is far more than histrionics.

It threatens the very fabric of our nation.

One party being unwilling to accept the results of an election, threatens the foundations of the country.

7 posted on 02/07/2020 5:00:13 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And have the dims learned anything from this epic fail?

The answer would be NO!!!!

Trump’s poll numbers have gone up 10 points to 50 so keep it up Nasty and get him to 60 by election day.


8 posted on 02/07/2020 5:00:16 AM PST by Lakeside Granny ( Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
If?!!! Stopped right there. Trump did nothing wrong. Stop with the hypotheticals please.

Exactly. It seems the author, for all his well written essay, cannot help but concede the Progressive assumptions as truth, even when they are obviously at issue, and most likely, false.

9 posted on 02/07/2020 5:02:59 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There was NOTHING inappropriate about that call. I am so sick of listening to a bunch of prissy people who probably have a ton of inappropriate behavior in their lives.


10 posted on 02/07/2020 5:06:20 AM PST by McGavin999 (Queen Fancy Nancy Of North Poopistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Even then, instead of spending the appropriate time building a solid case

The only case was Orange Man Bad. A large fraction of the voting public either can't swallow that hypothesis, or, those of us who can, maintain "good on him - we need an unguided missile to shred the roots of the deep state that have tapped into all the agencies and NGOs in DC.

11 posted on 02/07/2020 5:06:35 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans concede Trump’s call was unbecoming and, in parts, inappropriate, even if it didn’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense.”

Concede nothing, especially if it is not true. But even if it “looked bad”, concede nothing to the demonkraps, ever. Any concession is nothing but blood in the water and takes the issue further in their direction. Notice the demonkraps NEVER conceded that, as a minimum, the Bidens acted in a manner that raised questions.

Why don’t we have all the phone calls of Biden and obozo Ukranian released so we can compare what appropriate calls look like.


12 posted on 02/07/2020 5:08:37 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans concede Trump's call was unbecoming and, in parts, inappropriate, even if it didn't rise to the level of an impeachable offense.

He was doing so well, and then he decides to revert back to the sniveling, Democrat-approved GOP of yesteryear.

13 posted on 02/07/2020 5:12:00 AM PST by workerbee (America finally has an American president again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

There simply never was a real charge that could be explained in plain words. Some dimwit Harvard pretender-lawyer couldn’t connect the dots and you ended with a one-star Dallas-like drama, with fake actors and a marginalized script.


14 posted on 02/07/2020 5:17:29 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He did nothing to be impeached for, idiot.


15 posted on 02/07/2020 5:17:32 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot

Correct. NEVER apologize to the leftist outrage mob. You don’t get forgiveness anyway, and they simply use it as an admission of guilt to further beat you over the head.


16 posted on 02/07/2020 5:18:50 AM PST by StoneRainbow68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot

“Some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans concede Trump’s call was unbecoming and, in parts, inappropriate, even if it didn’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense.”

No, some of us would certainly have preferred that more Republicans had vociferously come out and declared that the Democrat case against the President was a media-supported sham with no facts, no substance, no standing and that both groups are very close to being rounded up for treason.


17 posted on 02/07/2020 5:19:10 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“ Even if Trump’s actions had risen to the level of removal,”

‘If?!!! Stopped right there. Trump did nothing wrong. Stop with the hypotheticals please.’

Same here. This piece is hard to skim on a fri morning just trying to get through what they’re saying about the weeks events this was where I was done.

People should stop by now expecting to find something corrupt about Trump. ‘They all do it’ is a mentality that expects the US to be mediocre thus falling further.

Trump is not corrupt

Hillary did her Clinton bc best to frame him and failed big league.

The media would do well to watch what happens next because it is over.

The


18 posted on 02/07/2020 5:20:19 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Impeachment Commandant Nancy Pelosi was salivating over removing Trump .... she desperately wanted to take his place.
She even tasked the wily Schiff to get dirt on Pence to shove him aside on her determined march to the Oval Office.

How do we know his?

Easy....Nanzi told us. She stupidly held a gleeful impeachment signing ceremony---handing out pens like she was already in office.

That alone, will go down in history as her biggest blunder.

19 posted on 02/07/2020 5:21:44 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It mostly failed because as the Impeachment dragged on more and more people who are basically apolitical began to be drawn to a simplistic conclusion that impeachment really, truly was intended only for a rape, a murder, or treason in time of all out war where the mainland is being attacked. And while that's a simplistic perception, the more impeachment dragged on the more people who most of the time don't vote developed a resentment over what they were seeing. Will that backlash result in participation at the ballot box? That's iffy, but more open political shenanigans, say a lot of consequences from the Democrat's "no bail" felon vote strategy could cause a bumper vote turn out that would cripple the Dems.
20 posted on 02/07/2020 5:21:50 AM PST by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson