this does seem engineered/designed/weaponized
the rising prevalance and rising
death rate is higher than SARS
there are very few recoveries so far.
the four HIV inserts are unlikely to be natural.
“Once is happenstance.
Twice is coincidence.
Three times is enemy action.”
Ian Fleming
Uh, no, it’s not. SARS had a 9.8% death rate. This Novel Coronavirus has a mere 2.2% death rate. SARS, according to the CDC had only 8,098 total infections worldwide during its entire 8 months run, mostly confined to China, while this one has so far approximately 13,000 in two months, mostly in Wuhan, China, so it is apparently a bit more virulent. However, SARS origination point was a much more rural area of China, not a major city such as Wuhan, which may account for the lower numbers and slower spread. At it’s highest spread SARS reached 22 countries.
the four HIV inserts are unlikely to be natural.
On the contrary, in RNA, random mutations often replicate strands of RNA that mimic other virus’ strands. Whether they are in significant areas of the code or not is what’s important to their ability to do anything. These are in areas that are “junk” code. Insignificant. Areas that are highly mutagenic and often get false duplicates. Viruses mutate, that’s how they survive. See MD Expat in PA’s debunking above in Reply #45. As the poster noted, “uncanny” is not a scientific term.