Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The answer is simple.

Charge full airfare for transport of the ESA.

If the passenger is declaring they can’t travel alone without the ESA, it’s the same as requiring a human “nurse” accompany the passenger.

FULL FARE — that will drastically reduce the use of ESAs for travel.

Not only that — TAG the passenger in the TSA database as emotionally unstable.

Luggage used to be free — that is long one, the free transport of ESA will be long gone, eventually.


17 posted on 01/30/2020 8:52:44 AM PST by detch (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: detch

Just taking you non-support cat in a carrier and placed under the seat in front of you is $180 on some flights.


28 posted on 01/30/2020 9:03:04 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: detch
Charge full airfare for transport of the ESA.

No thanks, I'd rather they just ban animals altogether. I don't want someone with unlimited cash or points, trying to game the system by claiming some non-existent mental condition.

81 posted on 01/30/2020 1:49:43 PM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson