Posted on 01/30/2020 8:33:21 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
The airline industry pushed for new rules to restrict emotional support animals, but advocates say such a major change is "discriminatory," "burdensome" and "unconscionable."
Jan. 30 (UPI) -- The U.S. airline industry is praising a move by federal regulators that would allow carriers to disqualify untrained "emotional support animals" as service animals -- a change that could lead to airlines charging travelers who bring along their pets.
Airlines are among the chief supporters of the proposed rule changes this month by the Department of Transportation. Federal officials began mulling the change over concerns from carriers, flight attendants, airports and some of the flying public about a rising number of passengers with emotional support animals, or ESAs -- that are taken aboard flights by way of a law intended for trained service animals, like guide dogs.
Under the Air Carrier Access Act, airlines are required to allow emotionally impaired travelers to bring a support animal at no added cost. In most cases, the only requirement is that a passenger produce documentation from health and veterinary professionals citing a need for the animal. Passengers without such records must pay to travel with their pets.
Those favoring the rule change argue that more passengers are taking advantage of what could be viewed as a loophole in the system -- and more types of animals are being claimed as an ESA. In recent years, ESA-documented passengers have boarded flights with dogs, cats, rabbits, miniature horses, Capuchin monkeys, snakes and peacocks, among others.
(Excerpt) Read more at upi.com ...
People who have emotional support animals need extensive therapy before leaving their homes.
Just leave it in the aisle way, the plane will be empty anyways......
Under the Air Carrier Access Act, airlines are required to allow emotionally impaired travelers to bring a support animal at no added cost.
I wonder if Europe and Asia are this permissive with support animals?
Ha ha, I misread and thought you wrote Brat, LOL! That would be funny too!
I’m totally for this. I don’t really want to board a plane with potentially disruptive animals on board.
I saw an article recently about a person who has a legitimate service animal, who is upset at people using all kinds of excuses to take pets on board planes. Her genuine need for a service animal tends to not be taken seriously because of all the fakers.
That was definitely one of the best movies ever. So politically incorrect in so many ways.
One flight attendant said it was starting to look like Noah’s ark.
Who let that filthy thing on the plane?
And why did she bring her pig?
I want to take my emotional support honey badger.
Some woman at my gym brings her support labradoodle with her. You look at the poor dog and he looks back as if he’s saying, “Yeah, I know, but what can I do?”
Not at the airport, that’s for sure.
I wouldn’t get on an airplane because I don’t want to be sexually molested by unionized gubmint workers who refuse to profile passengers that are the real danger to air safety.
I didn't discriminate nearly enough any of the three times.
NO MORE.
what about people that are forced to sit next to these animals who are allergic to animals? Guess their needs don’t matter?
So I’ve been checking them out and apparently, it is possible.
Thank God.
:D
Even veterans?
Heaven help the passengers who have to put up with an emotional support macaw.
On the upside, how many ROP nuts would want to intermingle their bits with pig bits?
For what reason do you bring that up? We’re talking about animals that are so large they’d be a hazard to a safe evacuation of an aircraft; how’d you like to be tripping over a pig or small horse? You bring that up just be provocative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.