[bagster]

You keep missing the point. The hospital exam found DNA evidence of another man, which indicated another partner after the alleged rape. That means the defense could argue the injuries were caused by the other man.

So let me get this straight. It's your theory that this girl had consensual sex with Koby Bryant and then went out later that night and was raped, resulting in the vaginal injuries, and decided to blame it on Kobe Bryant.

Is that seriously your contention, counselor? Despite the fact that Kobe was FORCED to admit that he had a long term and ongoing sexual affair with another woman in which he often choked the woman.

And that's what he was willing to admit, and only because he thought it would be exculpatory.

Kobe Bryant is dead.

Kobe Bryant was a rapist.

You are defending Kobe Bryant.

You defend rapists.

Science.

[Tired of Taxes]

So let me get this straight. It's your theory that this girl had consensual sex with Koby Bryant and then went out later that night and was raped

No, not raped, but the Defense could make the case that the injuries were caused by the other man or by multiple partners in three days.

This athlete was not an angel, and his behavior at that time was indefensible. The question is whether what happened amounted to a crime. You're convinced without a doubt that a crime happened, no matter what the circumstances were, and nothing I post will change that, so I think we're done here.