Posted on 01/28/2020 7:21:02 PM PST by conservative98
On Tuesdays broadcast of MSNBCs The Beat, House Impeachment Manager and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) stated that he wants to call former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly as a witness in the Senates impeachment trial. Because Kelly has indicated he has knowledge of what former National Security Adviser John Bolton would testify to.
Nadler said Democrats will want to call Bolton, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, and some of the other witnesses who we have heard had firsthand information. And maybe, now, John Kelly.
Host Ari Melber then asked, John Kelly, you would want to call, given his remarks about Boltons veracity?
Nadler responded, Yes. That would seem to indicate that he has knowledge of what Boltons testifying to.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The Dems are going to slit their own throats.
Enough
Enough
Call Maggie Haberman
I guess the Dems shouldn’t have rushed impeachment.
Gee whiz, Jerry, why didn’t you call him into the House hearings?
You don’t have any input into the Senate, do you?
How about both sides call all available witnesses, let the House and Senate sit out the election. We’ll all be better for it.
Never ending.....
Call Sean Misko.
Was he a cutout so Schiff’s staff could talk to Ciarmella?
Why was he hired within days of the whistleblower event?
What happened to the whistleblower who complained about he and Ciarmella talking sedition (how to get rid of Trump) within days of the inauguration?
OUT EVERY MARXIST
Don’t forget.....There are two whistle blowers....according to the attorney for WB #1
And before we proceed any further, release EVERY name of perp/office in the sex offenses taxpayers paid $20,000,000 to hush up.
We don’t need to know the details. We don’t need to know the victims names.
Just ID those who settled hush hush money for their sex offenses in office.
Whistle suckers.
It will be an endless parade if opened up.
Shut it down.
WHO CHANGED THE RULES TO ALLOW HEARSAY IN “WHISTLEBLOWING” CASES?
Did Schittstain speak with the Whistle Sucker before the claim was filed?
Put Schittstain under oath and cross examine him. Let him forever be a Schittstain on history.
How is it Democrats seem to run the show no matter what? I am fed up. Grow a pair, Mitch. End this. If for no other reason than to tell Schumer and company to pound sand like they have done to our side.
Ah, YES.
Kelly left in December of 2018. So....Witness to what?
Discovery is over.
Discovery is what the House does.
They are going to impeach him again anyways, just put all the “new” faux info in round two.
Thats what Ive been saying!
The GOP runs the Senate.
The House didnt allow the Minority to call a single witness.
Not one of these boobs will use the Whistleblowers name!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.