Posted on 01/28/2020 5:09:48 AM PST by richardtavor
Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit on Tuesday filed the indictment against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust with the Jerusalem District Court.
The indictment was filed a short time ago as is required by law, Mandelblits office said.
The move marks the first time in Israels history that a serving prime minister will face criminal charges, casting a heavy shadow over Netanyahu, Israels longest-serving prime minister, his legacy and his ongoing attempts to remain in power.
According to the text of the indictment, released by the Justice Ministry in November, Netanyahu is charged with fraud and breach of trust in Cases 1000 and 2000, and bribery, fraud and breach of trust in Case 4000.
The filing of charges came hours after Netanyahu announced Tuesday morning that he was withdrawing his request for parliamentary immunity from the pending indictment in the corruption cases against him.
Netanyahus announcement came hours before the Knesset was set to form a committee to debate and almost certainly reject his immunity request.
In a Facebook post, the premier denounced the immunity circus taking place while he was in Washington on a historic mission.
During this fateful time for the people of Israel, while I am in the US on a historic mission to shape Israels permanent borders and ensure our security for future generations, another Knesset episode is expected to begin in the immunity circus, the prime minister wrote.
Since I was not given due process, because all the rules of the Knesset were trampled on, and since the results of the procedure were pre-dictated without proper discussion, I decided not to allow this dirty game to continue, Netanyahu added.
The text of Netanyahus Facebook post was included in the official letter sent by his lawyers to Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein requesting that he withdraw the immunity bid.
The date for Tuesdays plenum discussion was set before the premier announced he would travel to Washington for the unveiling of US President Donald Trumps long-awaited peace plan, whose timing, announced last week, has been criticized in Israel as an attempt to rescue Netanyahu from the immunity proceedings.
By withdrawing his request, the prime minister avoided the spectacle of defeat in the Knesset immunity process. Rather than battling for his immunity in the run-up to the elections, however, he will now face the electorate as a defendant in three criminal cases.
Netanyahu had reportedly originally agonized over asking for immunity, which undercut his earlier defense that he would ultimately be found innocent of the charges against him.
The premiers main election rival, Blue and White party leader Benny Gantz, met Trump on Monday before traveling back to Israel to take part in the planned Knesset deliberation on forming a House Committee to debate Netanyahus immunity request.
Responding to the prime ministers announcement, Gantz said Tuesday that Netanyahu cannot run the country while standing trial in the three three cases against him.
Netanyahu is going to trial we must move forward. Israels citizens have a clear choice: A prime minister who will work for them or a prime minister working for himself, Gantz said in a statement.
No one can run a state and at the same time manage three serious criminal cases for bribery, fraud and breach of trust, he added, citing the charges against the prime minister.
According to the indictment, the prime minister damaged the image of the public service and public trust in it, and is suspected of abusing his position and status, and of knowingly taking a bribe as a public servant in exchange for actions related to your position.
The prime minister has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing in all three cases, and has alleged that the investigations against him are a witch hunt involving the left, the media and the police relentlessly pressuring a weak attorney general.
In Case 1000, involving accusations that Netanyahu received gifts and benefits from billionaire benefactors including Israeli-born Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan in exchange for favors, Mandelblit charged Netanyahu with fraud and breach of trust the latter being a somewhat murkily defined offense relating to an official violating the trust the public has placed in him.
According to the indictment in that case, Netanyahu damaged the image of public service and the publics trust in it, in that while serving in public positions, and foremost as prime minister maintained for years an inappropriate relationship with billionaire benefactors.
n Case 2000, involving accusations Netanyahu agreed with Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper publisher Arnon Mozes to weaken the circulation of a rival daily in return for more favorable coverage from Yedioth, Mandelblit charged the premier with fraud and breach of trust, while Mozes will be charged with bribery. The case is said to have been a contentious one in Mandelblits office, with many prosecution officials reportedly arguing that Netanyahu should be charged with bribery, while Mandelblit considered not charging the prime minister at all.
The indictment says that Netanyahu and Mozes recognized that the one had the ability to promote the others interest in the run-up to the 2015 elections and discussed such possibilities.
According to suspicions, in your actions while performing your duties you have committed acts that amount to breach of trust, and have caused substantial harm to the integrity [of the position] and the publics trust, it said.
In Case 4000, widely seen as the most serious against the premier, Netanyahu stands accused of having advanced regulatory decisions that benefited Shaul Elovitch, the controlling shareholder in the Bezeq telecom giant, in exchange for positive coverage from the Elovitch-owned Walla news site. In that case Mandelblit is charging Netanyahu and Elovitch with bribery.
The indictment says the relationship between Netanyahu and Elovitch was based on give and take, and the prime ministers actions benefiting Elovitch netted the businessman benefits to the tune of some NIS 1.8 billion ($500 million) in the period 2012-2017. In exchange, Elovitchs Walla news site published [Netanyahus] political messages that [he] wished to convey to the public, according to the indictment.
[He] took benefits while knowing [he was] taking a bribe as a public servant in exchange for actions related to your position, it alleged.
The prime ministers actions, wrote state prosecutors, were carried out amid a conflict of interests, the weighing of outside considerations relating to his own and his familys interests, and involved the corrupting of the public servants reporting to him.
Israel’s Nadler and Schiff at work.
Sounds like the Israelis have the same problem we do with our form of “justice” for all.
Only justice for the select few in the high castle
Immunity circus has a good ring to it.
Perfect timing to embarrass Netanyahu while on his trip to the US.
Globalists .... are everywhere !!!
The charges sound almost as ridiculous as the corrupt rats charges against president Trump. Just imagine if the democrat politicians had to live by the standards they are demanding of president Trump. They couldn’t even come close. They are the biggest hypocrite scumbags ever to walk the earth. They are too stupid to see how corrupt they look attacking a president who made his fortune outside of politics, while they all got rich off politics. What a bunch of lowlife scum.
I was just about to post that!
Thats exactly what they do to our President too!
So obvious!
Actually, the timing was the Prime Minister's choosing. Once he withdrew his request for immunity the AG by law had to serve the indictments.
The PM chose this time to use as a campaign issue.
Good luck.
The Democrats don’t have to bribe the mass media.
Their billionaires already own them.
Bibi took a box of cigars a gift and that is a bribe.
Hillary sold our Uranium for more than 100 million to Russia and that didn’t raise an eyebrow.
It’s the same thing that’s happening to Trump and happened to Matteo Salvini. The left conspiring to get rid of them because they oppose the islamization of their country!
Amazing how the second greatest enemy of the Jewish state appears to be Jews.
He pre-empted them. He chose the time before the speech, rather than have it sprung while sitting across from Trump. He realizes that this is just a weapon to be used against him.
Hyperventilation masquerading as law.
This is, as you say, amazingly similar to Trump’s impeachment. There is no case, but if they shout it and print it in all caps, maybe the charges will stick. You can imagine, in both cases, all kinds of skullduggery behind the scenes as the various people negotiate their price for betrayal.
Paging Mitt Romney...
First, please do not conflate the two men or their circumstances. They are both profoundly different.
Second, this has happened before, although Olmert's indictments came after he resigned from office.
Ehud Olmert, the PM right before Netanyahu's first term in 2009, resigned after learning he would be indicted for bribery and corruption while serving as the Mayor of Jerusalem and Minister of Trade. Interesting tidbit ... Netanyahu was leading the drumbeat at the time that a man with such personal problems hanging over his head is not in a position to serve as Prime Minister.
Olmert, a center-left politician, was found guilty of the charges in 2014 and sentenced to 19 months in prison. He served 16 months of that sentence.
Nah .. Netanyahu knew the Knesset committee would vote to deny his immunity request long before he stepped foot in the US.
Bibi gets one and only one shot at immunity
He withdrew the immunity request hoping the third time is a charm and he wins the election in March and can form a government. His last, best hope is to form a majority in the Knesset amenable to his next request for immunity.
BTW, Gantz's meeting with POTUS at the WH went well, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.