Skip to comments.
Top GOP Senators Dismiss Bolton Allegation That Trump Sought Ukraine Quid Pro Quo
Epoch Times ^
| 01/27/2020
| BY ZACHARY STIEBER
Posted on 01/27/2020 2:09:57 PM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2
posted on
01/27/2020 2:14:59 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
To: SeekAndFind
They have three of the four needed, Collins, Romney, Murkowsky, who will be #4?
Alexander or Burr possibly, both are retiring.
3
posted on
01/27/2020 2:20:46 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: SeekAndFind
and who collaborates what Bolden said/wrote in his tell all book. Oncet upon a time.... If this was coming from Butticheck it would really be a fairy tail.
4
posted on
01/27/2020 2:22:02 PM PST
by
DOC44
To: SeekAndFind
"He also alleged Trump also told Bolton that he wanted to keep withholding congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine to try to force officials there to open investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and Bidens son Hunter Biden."
If that's true the President apparently changed his mind. Maybe he was studying Bolton to see how he would react.
To: SeekAndFind
President Trump was merely trying to undo the 0bama/Biden/Clinton Quid Pro Quo.
6
posted on
01/27/2020 2:24:29 PM PST
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: SeekAndFind
The truth is any Republican Senator who acts like this matters hasn’t been listening to the number of Democrat fails and Trump wins.
Romney,Collins,etc your game is up. Choose your hurt.
To: SeekAndFind
How does anyone know what Bolton's allegation is? So far all we have is the NYT or some other fake news site quoting an anonymous source who knows someone who knows someone.
I have always been kind of a Bolton fan. I find it hard to believe he will make up something that contradicts the factual evidence everyone already has.
That doesn't mean anyone should vote to bring in witnesses.
8
posted on
01/27/2020 2:30:50 PM PST
by
stevem
To: SeekAndFind
Even if the allegations are true there is nothing illegal about this.
9
posted on
01/27/2020 2:31:56 PM PST
by
43north
(Its hard to stop a man when he knows he's right and he keeps coming.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Sanders and Warren could vote for no witnesses just to get it over with and get back on with their campaigning. That would be a hoot.
10
posted on
01/27/2020 2:40:15 PM PST
by
DOC44
To: SeekAndFind; All
Who cares? Since when is quid pro quo a criminal act? Every transaction in life is a quid pro quo.
11
posted on
01/27/2020 2:55:54 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
To: SeekAndFind
We need to hear the truth.What. You think Bolton is lying? That President Trump didn't really want to withhold the aid?
12
posted on
01/27/2020 3:04:28 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: clearcarbon
You have to just hand it to the left for their chutzpah. I mean Hillary did the deed, but didn't have the intent (so they say). President Trump had the intent, but didn't do the deed. And it is Trump that they want to call on the carpet.
I want to do my taxes. I tell my accountant that I want to write off my Maserati payments as a business expense. He talks me out of it. Should I go to jail for thinking about committing tax fraud? Jeez Louise.
13
posted on
01/27/2020 3:08:47 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
14
posted on
01/27/2020 3:16:20 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: stevem
"I have always been kind of a Bolton fan. I find it hard to believe he will make up something that contradicts the factual evidence everyone already has.
He might if he wanted to screw the democrats with a review copy of a manuscript subject to editing knowing it would be leaked.
To: DOC44
LOL, Id like to see Klobuchar, Sanders and Warren vote against witnesses. At this point their Depends are permanently soiled. They are probably off the scale with extreme anxiety and I love it!!!
16
posted on
01/27/2020 3:37:31 PM PST
by
RooRoobird20
(“The Democrats haven’t been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.”)
To: clearcarbon
He might if he wanted to screw the democrats with a review copy of a manuscript subject to editing knowing it would be leaked. Now that would be humor.
17
posted on
01/27/2020 4:12:27 PM PST
by
stevem
To: Cobra64
It how our entire government works as well.
To: All
Are the four or five actually going to side with Schmukie and creeps like Blumenthal over their own party?
To: Lurkinanloomin
After Dershowitz’s talk last night, I can see them deciding they don’t need any more witnesses because he made it clear the articles are unconstitutionally vague and that if every word about Bolton is true it means zilch because it also would not be impeachable...
20
posted on
01/28/2020 2:51:29 AM PST
by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson