Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Democrats dont really like it because it’s got a 100% yes 100% prediction rate for who the democrat nominee is going to be

if you win the Iowa caucuses you are the democrat nominee

make no mistake about it

and it’s a beautiful thing

these caucus is for Democrats because they need to talk with each other and have multiple votes especially when you have a big plate of candidates like this

the Republicans who make sense can get their arguments done very quickly whereas because liberals are ruled by emotion these things can go back-and-forth there’s tons of silly women involved in it can get very emotional and run around in circles and that’s why when it all gets hammered out in the Iowa caucus style that’s how they figure out who the Democrat nominees actually going to be Accurately


14 posted on 01/27/2020 12:33:49 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Truthoverpower

Dick Gephardt won Iowa in ‘88, was not nominated.

And of course home state Tom Harkin in 1992, which rendered the caucuses irrelevant that year.


31 posted on 01/27/2020 4:47:21 PM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson