Starr is making some good points now. There is no crime, high or otherwise. IMO, his trial is an exercise in futility; it is primarily just typical partisan electioneering for 2020.
I would love to be in the classes he teaches. He is both interesting AND informative. I love listening t this.
STARR is making a scholarly case knowing the Republican impeachment defense will be a model of restoring historical truth in law schools in years to come.
Ken Starr has gravitas.
They put him up first because of that. He’s “senatorial” and the opposite of Schiff & Nadler. He’s on their level and can lecture them in a fashion.
Starr is a brilliant attorney.
I think he speaks above what they can absorb.