Posted on 01/27/2020 6:27:17 AM PST by Kaslin
After three days of the House Managers’ rollout of the case against Donald Trump, it became clear Saturday morning that his defense team had some video clips of their own.
The key difference: Adam Schiff’s team buried us in quotes and excerpts designed to bolster conclusions fashioned in their heads; the defense attorneys provided a roadmap of things people actually said and did. Repeated examples of Trump voicing concern about Ukrainian corruption. Repeated examples of other nations facing interruptions in aid if their behavior didn’t improve. Taking up only a fraction of one day, Pat Cipollone, Jay Sekulow and company made clear what they have in store as the curtain goes up on Week 2 of impeachment.
There was concern that a Saturday session would not garner the audience captured by three Democrat forays into weekday prime time. But was anyone paying attention by Friday night? It’s hard to imagine millions delaying date nights so that they could catch the 22nd hour of Orange Man Bad. Saturday midday might not be a viewer magnet, but college football somehow manages to attract a crowd, so it’s a matter of whether people were interested.
I was. I was compelled by the first true example of an unfettered Trump defense in an environment not lorded over by Nancy Pelosi. It did not disappoint. And Monday should pick up with ample curiosity over the style, content and duration of the President’s defense effort.
Alan Dershowitz will get a lot of attention, as well he should, partly because he is a Hillary-voting liberal who nonetheless sees the folly of this impeachment effort, but also because his view of the “high crimes and misdemeanors” standard seems to be different than during the Clinton years. Let me clear this up for Dersh and anyone else: Of course there can be an impeachment without an actual violation of law. But short of that, it had better be something of such pernicious weight that the office itself is damaged to the chagrin of a wide political spectrum. The current spectacle is nothing of the kind.
This week will be a flipping of last week’s script. It is conservatives who will sing the praises of the presentations, and the president’s opponents who will give it the back of their hands. As was true last week, the impact of it as political theater will depend in whether any minds are changed. I suppose viewers who have not bathed in this story for months could have wandered into last week’s House manager marathon, staggering away under the weight of the assembled assertions of guilt, thinking surely there is fire behind these cascading billows of smoke.
But if those same viewers consume the defense, they may come to see the case against Trump as pure conjecture, fashioned from presumptions based on a political inclination to think the worst of a president Democrats could not beat in 2016 and may not be able to beat this November.
This narrow slice of the impeachment audience—the undecideds—will ultimately spell whether the whole drama hurts or actually helps Trump. Conclusions are baked into about 90 percent of the public, and an even higher percentage of the Senate. So what effect will witnesses have on both of those numbers?
No one knows. Democrats envision John Bolton delivering golden testimony that will at last reveal the depth of Trump’s treachery. On Sunday night, they gleefully embraced a tiny snippet of the forthcoming Bolton book in which the former National Security Advisor apparently recalls a conversation featuring Trump weighing a hold on Ukrainian aid until he sees some actual content of a corruption investigation.
In other words, the story of Trump hitting pause on Ukrainian aid dollars pending a commitment to probe corruption is now broken wide open by a Bolton assertion that Trump may have wanted to see actual findings before releasing that aid. What a bombshell.
But that’s what you’d think examining anti-Trump twitter, fawning over this development as a deal-sealer for the necessity of Bolton testimony. Have these people paid attention to Bolton for five minutes? He is a sharp, smart public servant who now envisions a post-government life as a pundit and benefactor through his BoltonPAC. He would also like to sell truckloads of books, a goal not aided by infuriating millions of Trump fans.
It is hard imagining the Democrat witness list providing the gotcha moment they have sought for years. But it is comparatively easier to imagine a Team Trump witness list sparking questions the House Managers decidedly do not want asked. Subpoena Hunter Biden, and the question arises as to what he was ever doing on the Burisma board. Subpoena the Whistleblower, and scrutiny follows as to whether he has always been a political hack wholly undeserving of the clout he has enjoyed.
And by the way, those questions will be broadly asked whether either of them shows up or not.
So far, only Mitt Romney seems eager to side with Democrats in a desire to drag impeachment to the Iowa caucuses if not beyond. One wonders what the senators running for president actually think about the notion of a prolonged confinement while their rivals shake hands and kiss babies from Cedar Rapids to Sioux City.
But for at least a few more days, they, and we, will see what issues from the Senate floor. The witness skirmish will determine whether we get back to our lives by next weekend, or we hunker down for a February filled with battles over narrative.
Did Adam Schiff poison his own witness quest by attempting to intimidate Republicans who might join Romney? Will the glow of the Trump defense’s moment in the spotlight dissuade momentary maverick instincts among Collins, Murkowski, Alexander or anyone else?
The end of this chapter in American history remains clear—a Trump acquittal. But the path to that, however long, will be filled with Democrat attempts to inflict as much damage as possible, and Republican attempts to spark a backfire for the ages.
We can call the whistle blower. He is NOT entitled to anonymity under all circumstances. He's too important not to call. The Dems don't want that to happen.
Bloomberg is the one most likely stuffing the whistle blowers pockets right now.
The WB should stay out of Marcy Park.
The Trump team would want to call the whistleblower, Shif and his staff, and the agent who amended the whistleblower form.
That would prove Bloomberg is a conceited, self-serving, arrogant, amoral, corrupt, malignant narcissist, Always wondered about that.
In no way fit to be president.
I hope the dozen or so people on the Trump defense team, Jordon et al, are ALL standing outside the Senate Chambers providing the media ongoing comments in the President’s and his WH counsels defense. It’s time to take up arms, not retreat.
Democrat media is already chortling the weekend Bolton revelation has undercut Trump’s defense strategy.
You knew they would say that - it’s not like they would give him a fair hearing.
Let’s get this impeachment farce over with ASAP.
It works both ways. Leftists bought the Muller Report thinking it would help their cause.
Feminist professors who said Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica was a "rape manual" probably led to some misunderstandings among curious undergraduates.
Democrats are going fight Trump from calling his own witnesses. They have no interest in a fair trial.
“Don’t kid yourself...The Dems don’t want witnesses.”
I think you are wrong. In fact that is goal #1 at the moment. any witnesses the GOP calls will plead the 5th, cannot recall etc The rats couldn’t care less about optics, you can be that way when you have the entire media establishment on your side.
Yup. This is just a talking point to make it look like Trump and the GOP have something to hide.
Its all political and the last thing on earth the Democrats want is Trump winning exoneration.
Which is going to happen with or without witnesses being called.
Mini Mike doesn’t stand a chance on stage with Trump, if he gets that far. Can you imagine a 5 foot two Mike, standing next to President Trump at 6 foot two? A landslide, because the taller candidate always wins.
Never underestimate the GOP’s ability to capitulate before the first shot.
Here are fun facts about heights of candidates. Trump is number 3 of all time under Lincoln. James Madison was 5 ft. 4.
Says “most” taller ones win. I thought all.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_presidents_and_presidential_candidates_of_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_presidents_and_presidential_candidates_of_the_United_States
Sorry, meant to include this but missed it on heights of candidates——
In fact that is goal #1 at the moment. any witnesses the GOP calls will plead the 5th, cannot recall etc
**************
I think you are right.
The Democrats have nothing to fear from the Republicans. In fact, they never do because they know the GOP is weak and rolls over for them.
The Repukes in the senate have already let this disgraceful charade go on too long, which only benefits the Dems.
Never underestimate the GOP’s ability to capitulate before the first shot.
**************
You are absolutely right.
And the corollary to that is never trust the GOP. They are a bunch of posers and backstabbers.
Note how the Dems keep punding away at the Republicans year after year with one outrageous tactic after another. Its like a never ending series of political assaults.
The simple reason they keep doing this is they don’t repect Republicans — because Republicans don’t fight back.
If someone throws a punch at you expect them to keep hitting you if you don’t punch back. A simple truth that the GOP just cannot seem to understand. And they never will. So the attacks just keep on coming ad infinitum.
And listening to President Trump he is very angry and pissed off !!
and I believe that we are going to see some actual indictments and criminal charges against some of these seditious conspiracies coming down yet this year
I certainly hope I’m not wrong
DC doesn’t punish DC. One of the reasons is that they don’t want the excrement to hit the ocillating device. Once it starts flying around there’s no telling who it will hit so they make sure the box stays shut.
Its “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” in the Swamp.
Does Ciaramella still work for the CIA? Has he reported this outside income to the security office?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.