Someone pleaze explain this to me. I’m lost.
Trump asks the ukies and China to investigate a corruption.
By doing so, how can that affect the 2020 elections? Will the Ukies and Chinese be voting in our election?
Is it because it will be revealed that the candidates are corrupt and will be disqualified? If this is the case then the dems know that the candidates are corrupt and themselves are doing a cover-up.
When that blond chick spoke, I got the impression that we the voters are too stupid to know for whom to vote for.
They’re tossing all sorts of adjectives and actions at President Trump, but they are not specific about their accusations. They’re repeating the same talking points and not going any deeper to give out info.
BTw, watching schitt’s hands is interesting. He always has one hand immobile while the other one stiffly gesticulates. If he moved both hands at once would he topple over?
Because if they followed up and found the corruption, the leading (at the time) Democrat would be forced out.
Basically, their entire premise is built on the fact that Biden is corrupt. Trump’s team is going to have a field day with that.
I don’t know what he’s doing with his left hand (and I don’t want to know) but I have a feeling that round thing on his lapel is the buzzer that Jose Altuve wore during the 2017 World Series. Whenever Schiffforbrains starts to go off-script, somebody hits a button and that shocks him back on message.
You got it right.
The part you left out (perhaps the reason you are lost) is the horse race.
It's a race to get President Trump removed before he can finish exposing Biden and the rest. They figure if they can oust Trump, then the investigations will end and the news will be about Trump "and his GOP enablers and co-conspirators," allowing their weak slate of 2020 candidates to win.
If Trump beats them to the finish line, they are done. None of their candidates will win, and they may lose seats in the Senate and the House.
That's what this impeachment is, a cunning election strategy for 2020.
Alexander Hamilton wrote about it in Federalist #65:
...the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt... the most conspicuous characters in it will, from that circumstance, be too often the leaders or the tools of the most cunning or the most numerous faction...They don't get more cunning than Pelosi, Schiff, and Schumer.
-PJ