Posted on 01/23/2020 6:33:47 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
The challenge is becoming increasingly clear for House Democrats prosecuting President Donald Trumps impeachment case as the Senate convenes for a second day of arguments in the landmark trial.
No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump, it becomes less compelling when presented again and again, day after day, as Democrats try to convince not just fidgety senators but an American public deeply divided over the Republican president in an election year.
The team led by Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of House Intelligence Committee, constructed a gripping account of Trumps political pressure on Ukraine and attempt to cover up the corrupt scheme central to the charges. But the limits are apparent. Prosecutors must rely on the same loops of videotaped testimony ambassadors, national security officials and even the president himself after Trumps GOP Senate allies blocked new witnesses.
Democrats were once reluctant to take on impeachment during an election year but are marching toward a decision by the Senate that the American public also will judge.
Some Republicans expressed disdain for it all. Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa spoke sarcastically about how excited she was to hear the overwhelming evidence the House Democrats promised against Trump.
And once weve heard that overwhelming evidence, she said, raising her voice mockingly, I dont know that well need to see additional witnesses, but lets hear about that overwhelming evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
When you have no evidence, and you loop it over and over, clearly it hurts your case.
lol
There is no overwhelming evidence and this sham only reinforces that. This is going to be trouble for the Democrats and at the end people will be calling for their heads.
They're playing Hillary's game: playing to their donor base, giving them a thrill to get donations.
They fail to realize the rest of us are paying attention.
Meanwhile Trump is waging war against Deep State.
<><>Trump's appointment of scores of federal judges and two world-class USSC justices,
<><> his super-ability to organize huge rallies,
<><> his ability to unite even he most recalcitrant Republicans.
<><> exposing ways the Deep State monetized public policy.
Democraps have amassed huge fortunes on the backs of working class taxpayers.
And for this, the Democrats must stop Trump. Democraps are in abject fear.
Indeed, and the fact that the senators didn't dismiss after day one dirties the fine legacy of the Senate and contributes to future farcical impeachments.
What could be less compelling then being told again and again that Trump is guilty because “We know what he was thinking”?
Quite honestly I do not know how the senators can sit hours on end forced to listen to the drivel coming from the podium. It reminds me of going to DMV traffic school and being lectured for the day on driving safety to get a traffic ticket dismissed. I guess that’s why they invented No Doz.
By LISA MASCARO, ERIC TUCKER and ZEKE MILLER......In the old days it just took one journalist to lie up a crapola article.
Ever noticed how the majority of lying screeds spewed by the MSM have 2, 3 even 4 authors nowadays?
Evidence? For what? It’s day three Schiffy, what is the crime?
The more compelling the evidence, the more it speaks for itself. The less compelling the evidence, the more it needs people to speak for it. The more they speak, the less convinced people will be. I say speak on, Schiffty!
The AP states, without providing any proof, No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump....
Plus, NO ONE is watching. Its a bad rerun of a boring Schiff show.
I think even the rabid anti-Trump partisans at the AP and other media outlets are genuinely shocked at how much stronger and more assertive President Trump has gotten since this impeachment charade began last year.
Maybe they can have Schiff give some of that gripping to Pelosi.
Stupid, AP. There is no overwhelming evidence. In fact, there is no crime. What a ridiculous charade this impeachment is. Absolutely disgusting and sickening.
YEAH...mock the bastards!
But they are all 21 years old. When you have three of them write an article, you have a combined 63 years of experience like you got in the old days with one grizzled, seen-it-all reporter.
AP doing ground prep for the coming EPIC FAIL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.