Unfortunately it didn't help the Chinese, the Cambodians, the Tibetans, the Rwandans, the Timorese, etc.
The only thing it's being used for now is to stifle climate debate.
How does remembering the Holocaust stifle climate debate?
Further, the climate debate has been settled. Global warming and climate change is a complete fraud, as presented for control.
Yes, the weather changes. Who knew? And the idea we’re having the hottest days in history is preposterous.
We had one of the coldest years in decades here in Los Angeles last year. The Sun is exhibiting less activity that changes our climate, and it’s simply cooler because of it.
We have got to quit buying into the propaganda that has been spewed for the last 25 years, and has not come true at all.
“Remembering the Holocaust was supposed to help prevent future cases of genocide.”
That said, MERELY learning about something (or teaching about it to others) BY ITSELF, does absolutely nothing. Oh, some (or many) are informed - but if they just sit around the next time a similar event occurs and talk about it, then all of that learning is pretty much for nought. In the case of the Shoah (Holocaust), the people who perpetrated it were very sure that violence used by them against others would solve what they viewed as a problem. They did NOT subscribe to the (fatally flawed, in my view) belief that “violence never solved anything.” So, in view of the willingness of clearly evil people to use violence against innocents, for innocents to do nothing but sit around and talk about things is not merely useless, but it almost serves as an invitation to commit exactly that kind of violence. I, personally, subscribe to the ideal of doing no harm to others, but also not allowing others to do harm to you - which necessarily means that sometimes you have to do what the Israelis did in 1967, which is to hit the other guy first, before he can fatally strike you. Also, as a Jew, I am keenly aware that there are only about 15 million of us left on this ball of dust - so we don’t have the luxury of sitting around and having a nice academic discussion about how wrong it is for someone else to do violence against us; we simply cannot absorb large numbers of casualties and then (righteously) strike back later. I don’t want my epitaph to be, “Well, at least he acted morally and wasn’t the aggressor.” Screw that - survival is far more important.
For that matter, remembering the Armenians didn’t help the Jews and the Gypsies much, either.