To: TigersEye
McConnell has put into the rules the possibility of dismissal at the outset. Laura Ingraham says she learned tonight just the opposite -- NO motion to dismiss is provided in Mitch's rules. Don't know whose right on this, but the weak-spined Pubs shouldn't let the Dems drive this with witnesses, continual new evidence, etc.
85 posted on
01/20/2020 7:23:25 PM PST by
CedarDave
(Democrats are the Granola Party -full of fruits, nuts and flakes. And they lie, that's who they are.)
To: CedarDave
She then went on to implore listeners to call the capital switchboard and tell their pub senators to insist on having a motion to dismiss in the rules.
202-224-3121
86 posted on
01/20/2020 7:28:11 PM PST by
CedarDave
(Democrats are the Granola Party -full of fruits, nuts and flakes. And they lie, that's who they are.)
To: CedarDave
It’s there from line 5 to line 19.
90 posted on
01/20/2020 7:41:17 PM PST by
TigersEye
(MAGA - 16 more years! - KAG)
To: CedarDave
Sigh...read it again. If after both sides present their arguments, the Senate will then decide to have witnesses. If both sides are happy that all has been said, then they can vote to acquit/convict or vote to have witnesses.
My guess is they will vote to have witnesses.
93 posted on
01/20/2020 8:50:57 PM PST by
Dave W
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson