Posted on 01/20/2020 9:08:01 AM PST by karpov
The Trump administration is under fire for daring to touch a third rail of liberal financial regulation: the 1978 Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA. The proposed new regulations would affect 70 percent of banks by replacing requirements that bank lending target specific geographies or borrowers, such as low-income minorities. Instead, banks would set total dollar goals for lending to low-income borrowers, with the aim of helping poor communities broadly, rather than focusing on specific neighborhoods.
Some of these loans might have occurred anyway, and critics (which include the Federal Reserve) oppose the idea that banks could get CRA credit for them. But the new policy should be welcomed as an improvement for lower-income business and mortgage borrowers. Operating in a far more competitive financial-services industry than the late 1970s, lenders will better serve poor neighborhoods by treating them no differently than more affluent areas.
The CRA has become a liberal iconand a conservative bête noire, cast as a partial accessory to the 2008 financial crisis, on the view that pressuring banks to make loans based on borrowers location, rather than on their creditworthiness, leads to poor underwriting practices. Regardless of how one sees the CRAs history, the Trump administration is right to revise the law; it would be right to repeal it, too, though repeal is unlikely.
The CRA doubtless pushes banks to allocate capital in unconventional ways. For groups like the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a defender of the law, thats exactly the point. In their eyes, low-income minority areas are underserved by lenders. The New York Times echoes that view. Banks dont like lending in lower-income neighborhoods, its editorial board declared, even as they profit from deposits taken from those same communities. Many neighborhoods, the paper continued, are credit deserts.
(Excerpt) Read more at city-journal.org ...
It's not that they are underserved by lenders. It's that a lot of the prospective loans are "undeserved" due to credit history and past performance.
Note on the Community Reinvestment Act: Every year the FFIEC releases bank lending information that the banks are supposed to use to help determine if they are in compliance. We are in the fourth year of Trump, and those crazies are proposing an exponentially more complex set of data and regulation that will add little to the objectives to the act, but much to bank headaches. The folly of this is demonstrated by the fact that the FFIEC was FIVE MONTHS late in releasing the 2018 data this year (late December instead of middle of July) while the banks only have three months to compile it.
Anything to soften that monster of a law is good.
We of course don’t want discrimination based on race, but that is already illegal.
If anyone can demolish that horrendous thing its just our awesome President, Donald J . Trump
If anyone can demolish that horrendous thing its just our awesome President, Donald J . Trump
They are credit deserts for exactly the same reason they are food deserts. Big volume grocers like Kroger, Sav-a-Lot, Aldi's and Wal-Mart won't put up stores in these neighborhoods because the loss from stealing is just too high to make even a modest profit. Likewise, bigger banks won't put up branches for the same reason.
These leaves any service they get at all to smaller, higher margin grocers or payday lender type places which can survive in such a dangerous environment. It is NOT rocket science.
It’s not good to lend money to people who have know visible means of paying it back. Not good for the lenders; not good for the borrowers.
The CRA was nothing more than a revolving piggy bank for Dems.................
From time to time it’s important to drop El Trumpo a brief note.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
I sent a not last week and received a lovely letter back from White House!!!
Not = note SORRY
[they profit from deposits taken from those same communities.]
know?
Loans should be based on the exact same standards of credit worthiness - across the board... To do otherwise invites disasters like the housing collapse that happened a few years back...
Bingo
Indubitably.
No poop, Sherlock.
underserved by lenders
It’s not that they are underserved by lenders. It’s that a lot of the prospective loans are “undeserved” due to credit history and past performance.
********
Banks are not stupid. And they are not run by the stereotypically racist type of southerner that inhabited the old south. Modern banks are well aware that they would be shafting themselves by favoring whites with higher credit risk than blacks.
It’s been while, but rehashing the CRA —
The CRA program/office was created by Carter, and later intentionally exploded under Bill Clinton, who tasked certain key lawyers (including a lead lawyer named *B H O bama*).
With the White House also pressuring and manipulated the media and court, Obama and legal team won the key lawsuit, which forced the nation’s largest banks to change lending policy.
Banks were to remove lending restrictions specifically from minority applicants, regardless of score. Banks had to knowingly make housing loans available across the country, to people who would never pay them back, and in some cases, never intended to pay them back.
The case was strategically built around one of Clintons specialty’s, the targeted weaponization of civil rights (race). On Clintons que, the mass media and press painted banks and lenders as racist, which intentionally excluded loans based on race.
The banks were trashed by mass media and press.
Obama and his legal team were dependant on the “full court press” triggered and applied by the Clinton White Hut.
And PRESTO!
Now banks had to scale go total “sub-prime”!
There were other factors, but this was a key “biggly” reason for the precipitous mortgage meltdown which really broke the economy, which was then blamed on Bush and Republicans.
Ironic isn’t it (NOT). Clinton’s own “CRA Obama” would in 2007, get to blame and absolutely trash Bush for the economic destruction of his own hard fought handiwork!
Obama then goes on to play “messiah”, hand out obama-phones, and finish Clinton’s 30 year IC/DOD/DOJ/FBI/TREASURY/OMB purges of as many Patriots as possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.