Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woodbutcher1963
" Who pays for their protection now that they are no longer members of the royal family?"

Why do they need protection? Is there a law on the books that they must be protected? They want to be one of us so let them live like us.

96 posted on 01/20/2020 8:42:07 AM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: 1_Rain_Drop

“They want to be one of us so let them live like us”

Yes, I am sure they will be Ubering around town, taking the bus, riding the metro.
It will suck to not have a Rolls Royce or Bentley to ride around in at your disposal.


100 posted on 01/20/2020 9:20:27 AM PST by woodbutcher1963 (HATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

Now that they are not officially ‘royal’, perhaps they should not get protection. However, Harry’s foolishness does not negate the fact that he is the son of a future King of England and the brother of another future King of England. Meghan, not so much. I see no reason why she needs publicly financed protection.

But, then there is little Archie. He does need protection as he is a perfect target for kidnapping. Poor little guy. He’s very cute. His papa and Mama have separated him from his heritage as a royal, his great grandparents, his grandfathers, his uncles, aunts and cousins.

Yes, Archie is a real ‘poor little rich boy’ who has done nothing wrong, yet because of his parents, his future is in doubt.


110 posted on 01/20/2020 5:28:47 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson