Nadler: ‘We Heard from Enough Witnesses to Prove the Case Beyond Any Doubt’

Breitbart ^ | 01/15/2020 | Ian Hanchett

[Alas Babylon!]

There you go.

If they’ve from enough, they don’t need anymore.

Mitch, you’ve been told, so you know what to do.

[Alberta's Child]

I totally agree with Nadler on one point. There is no need for additional witnesses.

The Senate should not allow a single witness to testify unless that person had already testified in a House proceeding related to the impeachment.

[bk1000]

Every loudmouth Dem ended their screed with “No one is above the law”. That phrase is going to bite them in the backside.

[Carriage Hill]

He looks like a pile of laundry with feet.

[freefdny]

Exactly. Why do you need new witnesses then?

[MisterArtery]

That’s probably correct. I was behind a pants-dragger at 7-11 a while back. When he reached for his wallet he had to crouch and search behind his knee.

[kempster]

Heard it from a guy who...

[Mr. Jeeves]

Reality is what they feel it is. And addressed to a public with a woeful lack of training in critical thinking, it works too often.

[Swordmaker]

He looks like a pile of laundry with feet.

He has twin cousins. . . Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum.

[PGalt]

Sure Nonads. Impeach the impeachers. READY - AIM - VOTE Sight it in. 2020

[DOC44]

Dems getting cold feet about having additional witnesses because it will go bad for democrat reps and senators who are on the take from Ukraine either them or their relatives. They be agetting pascared. Let those without being on the take cast the first stone.

[nikos1121]

Sad thing is that 40% of the people in the USA are like the women on The View. They believe this crap...

[butlerweave]

You only proved you are Evil and you will pay for it down the road

[dandiegirl]

I’m just dying for some reporter to ask them if Hillary is above the law. Please.

[liberalh8ter]

What’s the over/under on Nadless surviving the Senate trial? He looked pretty gray yesterday.

[cymbeline]

“Nadler doesn’t grasp how many Americans believe that the relationship between the Bidens and Ukraine is a legitimate topic of inquiry.”

I’m one of those Americans and our side must substantiate that belief in the Senate trial.

[SGCOS]

On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “OutFront, House Judiciary Chairman...” ..

For a second there, I thought I read: "On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “OutHouse”

[grobdriver]

Ha ha ha - you had your chance to depose witnesses, lard-ass.

Your boss was in a hurry and now you get to live with it.

[bob_esb]

GAO finds Trump administration broke law by withholding aid from Ukraine

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/478557-gao-finds-trump-administration-broke-law-by-withholding-aid-from

Crap - here go the RINOs - this was planned all along

[Ancesthntr]

‘We Heard from Enough Witnesses to Prove the Case Beyond Any Doubt’

---

Oh, Jabba, like the ambassador who testified that he specifically asked Trump what he wanted from Ukraine, and Trump responded, “Nothing, not a single thing. No quid pro quo, I just want their President to keep his promise to investigate corruption in his country.” THAT witness, Jabba?