Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2020 11:08:45 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: knighthawk

They have been talking about missiles like this for decades now, but we don’t seem to be any closer to a deployable weapon than we were in the 90s.


2 posted on 01/15/2020 11:41:16 PM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Ship without a mission meets mission without a ship.


3 posted on 01/15/2020 11:51:51 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

That is one sweet looking fishing trawler (radar signature).


4 posted on 01/15/2020 11:54:35 PM PST by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

This seems kind of expensive when you could have a sub near by shoot a cruise missile.


6 posted on 01/16/2020 12:27:01 AM PST by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

How’s China and Russia to know the difference?


7 posted on 01/16/2020 12:29:44 AM PST by Dogbert41 (Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

“The Conventional Prompt Strike weapons program, which emerged [in] the era of former President George W. Bush, is designed to arm a ballistic missile with a conventional warhead, bringing the range and speed similar to a nuclear weapon to conventional strike.”

How does a jumpy nuclear armed adversary tell the difference?


10 posted on 01/16/2020 1:08:55 AM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

L8r


11 posted on 01/16/2020 2:01:54 AM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk; Travis McGee; Diogenesis; SkyPilot; null and void


(well this thread reminded me of that....so....)
13 posted on 01/16/2020 2:09:57 AM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Why does the Navy want to replicate the mission of the SSBN’s. I ‘get’ that the “Zummwalts” are probably going to serve-out their lives as test-beds. Maybe they should paint them orange?


15 posted on 01/16/2020 3:24:48 AM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Whoa...


16 posted on 01/16/2020 3:37:21 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

“The Navy’s newest destroyer may fire a not-yet-to-be fielded Conventional Prompt Strike conventionally-armed missile...”

Taking apart this sentence, the qualifier “may” disqualifies everything else that follows. And to add to the fluff factor of the article, the missile “yet to be fielded” means it is not yet out of testing and perhaps doesn’t even exist.


17 posted on 01/16/2020 3:59:55 AM PST by Flick Lives (MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Designing a ship around a weapon that doesn’t exist. I guess the corrupt decision makers didn’t learn anything from the last destroyer fiasco along those lines.


21 posted on 01/16/2020 5:22:29 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Let’s hope the navy ensures there are no captain Jack Rippers in command.


23 posted on 01/16/2020 5:30:17 AM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Some years ago there were supposedly kinetic energy weapons being developed. These would use tungsten rods dropped from orbit or from an ICBM that would hit their target at speeds of 17,000 mph and pack a near nuclear bomb punch. That would seem to be an ideal warhead for these new missiles.


24 posted on 01/16/2020 8:09:18 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

The why bother putting it on a boat?


25 posted on 01/16/2020 8:21:01 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

The Russians already have Hypersonic missiles that travel at 20 times the speed of sound,President Trump mentioned last week we have them in production,whatever that means,so a missle that takes an hour won’t be of much use


28 posted on 01/16/2020 12:22:19 PM PST by ballplayer (By)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson