Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ERA R.I.P., Saving Girls Sports
Townhall.com ^ | January 15, 2020 | John and Andy Schlafly

Posted on 01/15/2020 3:41:13 AM PST by Kaslin

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is officially dead, declares the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice.  Its announcement is just in time to save girls’ sports from ruination by testosterone-advantaged boys.

We are four decades past the moment when ERA went lifeless under its own deadline for ratification.  That is long past any chance at resuscitation, the OLC explained in its detailed legal analysis.

“Congress may not revive a proposed amendment after a deadline for its ratification has expired,” the OLC concluded. “Should Congress wish to propose the amendment anew, it may do so through the same procedures required to propose an amendment in the first instance,” for which there is not the two-thirds supermajority in Congress to pass.

The Archivist of the United States immediately stated that he would comply with this legal ruling, as he should.  He will not add to the Constitution any belated attempt by a state to ratify posthumously this amendment.

This good news comes not a moment too soon.  Liberals who have taken over the statehouse in Richmond had planned to make Virginia the 38th state which, if the 5 rescissions are not counted, would ostensibly satisfy the three-fourths requirement to put ERA in the Constitution.

A reenactment of those who supported ERA in the 1970s can be seen in a trailer for a new miniseries about Phyllis Schlafly called “Mrs. America,” to be aired on the Hulu streaming service beginning April 15.  Two-time Academy Award winner Cate Blanchett is portraying Phyllis, but the script is sympathetic to the ideology of radical feminists.

ERA supporters are generally not athletes, and either don’t know or don’t care about the havoc that ERA is causing for girls’ sports in states which have passed it.  In Massachusetts its state ERA has required that boys be allowed to compete in girls’ sports, to break their records and potentially break their bones in contact sports like field hockey.

Without ERA in the U.S. Constitution, neighboring New Hampshire is able to hold a hearing this week on good legislation to protect girls against unfair competition by boys in girls’ sports.  Boys have overpowering advantages of muscular size, thanks to testosterone, and there is nothing fair about allowing them to go into girls’ sports to win prizes and shatter records.

Sponsored by ten women, New Hampshire HB 1251 would prohibit allowing boys to invade girls’ sports, as is happening in other states under the guise of ERA or transgender rights.  This legislation would limit competition in girls’ sports based on the athlete’s chromosomes, reproductive organs, and testosterone levels.

“Interscholastic or intramural athletic teams or sports that are sponsored by a primary or secondary school or institution of higher education and designated for ‘females,’ ‘women,’ or ‘girls’ shall only be open to students of the female sex,” states HB 1251.  This fairness would not be possible if ERA were ratified.

“Biological males are already starting to dominate women’s competitive sports” and females “deserve a level playing field,” says Save Women’s Sports and Cornerstone, which supports the New Hampshire legislation.  “They should not have to compete against biological males for a spot on the podium, even if those males claim a female gender identity.”

Hollywood could be presenting, in its heart-wrenching style, true stories about girls who trained hard for competitions which they won against other girls, but were then denied the awards grabbed by transgendered biological boys instead.  This has happened in Connecticut, where there is no limit on transgenders crossing over to win races in girls’ sports.

ERA, indeed, would have mandated this unfairness by prohibiting sensible distinctions based on sex.  If ERA had become part of the Constitution, there would have been nothing any state or Congress could do to protect girls against the unfair ruination of their sports by boys.

So while Hollywood has promoted ERA since the 1970s, top women athletes are speaking out on the conservative side of this issue.  Transgender athletes could ruin women’s tennis and many other sports, and some women champions have spoken out against this trend.

Yet non-athlete Elizabeth Warren clings to the mindless-equality approach of ERA, and even wants to put male convicts into women’s prisons.  Phyllis Schlafly warned that ERA would have required prisons to be co-ed, and that women would be ordered to guard dangerous male prisoners.

Warren and Hollywood supporters of ERA should pay more attention to girls who work hard to win scholarships in their high school sports.  ERA has the effect of denying these girls the honors they earned, which boys took away from them.

Rather than endorsing ERA postmortem, the Virginia legislature should help girls by considering the New Hampshire bill to protect them against unfair competition.   ERA died long ago, and should rest in peace.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: constitution; equalrightsamd; feminism; identitypolitics

1 posted on 01/15/2020 3:41:13 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Somebody tell Fox News that the unratified ERA died in 1982. Yesterday, Brett Baier announced that the idiot Democrats in VA just became the 38th state to pass the ERA, which makes three-fourths of the states.

It’s dead, Brett, so that important detail should have been mentioned. The ignorant Democrats in VA would be the first state to revive this moribund amendment. Only 37 more states to go.


2 posted on 01/15/2020 5:13:38 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hoist by their own pitard.

Sorry. For decades womyn have demanded to be allowed into boys sports like wrestling, which put the athletes they compete against at real risk of sexual harassment lawsuits.

Now the same bunch are angry that boys are putting on skirts and demanding to be treated like womyn under the same law.

We warned you. We begged you. But the same concerned lydies demanded “equality”.

Now, you get it. Good luck.

For me and my house, I will teach my girls to be Ladies, and that there are things that Men and Women do differently, do together, and are to be done apart.


3 posted on 01/15/2020 5:42:42 AM PST by redgolum (If this culture today is civilization, I will be the barbarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But they will still be allowed in girls’ locker rooms and restrooms? This is a complete denial of reality.

I wish people would stop acting as if the only difference is hormonal. Males have different skeletal structures and muscle mass. No amount of surgery or hormone treatment is going to alter that. If you were born male, you are a male, no matter how much that might upset you. Ditto for female.

The world has gone crazy.


4 posted on 01/15/2020 6:10:58 AM PST by Pining_4_TX ("Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods." ~ H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

A federal court in Idaho ruled that the ERA died in March 1979. It ruled that the method that Congress used to extend the ratification window into 1982 was unconstitutional.


5 posted on 01/15/2020 9:14:50 AM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson