To: DoodleBob; SaxxonWoods
the actual crowd he drew was much bigger than what the Examiner would bias you to believe
Noted: I'll avoid their stories henceforth.
So instead, you'll get your "facts" (and post here) from sources who endorsed Cankles in 2016 ... got it!
You seem very concerned about this story. If believing that there were 100-150 people there (attendees, not staff/police/people walking by) makes you sleep better, go for it.
67 posted on
01/12/2020 10:40:49 AM PST by
kevcol
To: kevcol; SaxxonWoods
Hmmm...sources that endorse Hillary are bad...ok...but I guess pictures from The Columbian, Mercury News, and Newsweek are kosher? Or, better yet, the pic you posted...
...clearly came from a totally unbiased source: https://cbsnews3.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2020/01/11/8a9428af-b902-4e79-a401-fa07139dc8c4/thumbnail/1200x630/474230d230910134da326bd4d4bf0164/ap-20011672932925.jpg.
Your concern over my concern is appreciated. Thank you.
121 posted on
01/12/2020 4:21:54 PM PST by
DoodleBob
(Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson