Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2020 5:44:52 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Kaslin

And how about a combined Marvel superhero, Easter bunny, earth mother of all things? Would such a creature by definition be the same?

I don’t ask this to mock God, but rather to mock the poor logical argument that if we conceive an all-powerful in our mind, but definition the conception must be all powerful and must therefore exist.


2 posted on 01/12/2020 5:49:15 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The smell of baking bread.


3 posted on 01/12/2020 5:56:12 AM PST by Artemis Webb (There are only two genders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The thought expressed in another way is: The rational conclusion is there is no other course but God

Having arrived at that point, the differences and diversity in thought come into play


4 posted on 01/12/2020 5:56:59 AM PST by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
One of the simplest (to me at least) and powerful arguments in favor of God's existence is Jupiter. When someone makes a convincing argument to me that there was no "supreme being" or "supreme force" connected to Jupiter's existence I *might* start to question God's existence.

Until then....no.

5 posted on 01/12/2020 6:10:04 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

How’s this for an argument?

“If you exist, then God must exist”.


7 posted on 01/12/2020 6:16:30 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Philosophy presupposes that the human mind is capable of understanding the universe and explaining it logically. I would say that not only is that an impossibility, but God is beyond the scope of the universe as well. But the old argument "if there is not God, then how does anything exist in the first place?" is simply a question, not an answer. I think there is another reason, besides lack of evidence or rationality, that atheists refuse to believe in God: they don't want to. In fact they seem to put in quite a bit of effort into convincing themselves (more than anyone else) that he doesn't.

"Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil."

I think atheists prefer their world of no fixed morality, because at some level their interests lie on the wrong side of it. So does everyone's to a certain degree, but the typical atheist has crossed their own tipping point.
8 posted on 01/12/2020 6:19:52 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Virtual particles on into existence out of nothing.


9 posted on 01/12/2020 6:26:22 AM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There is a much simpler proof that God exists.

First. one must define God. The term means many things to different people.

The simpler proof is to experience God first hand. Why read and study the manual on how to ride a bike if you never get on and ride. The Bible is the manual on how to experience God. People keep reading the manual but never go for the ride.

I’m a neuroscientist and have presented and demonstrated on the “Neuroscience of Prayer” and “The science supporting the Bible.”

First, I define God as any level of consciousness that exists above the level that I exist. My Father’s Mansion has many rooms or levels. We are stuck in the basement. Jesus is God as He is in a higher level.

I invite atheists, agnostics and freethinkers to my presentations. I have had hundreds attend and have had many wonderful comments and feedback. I have never had a negative comment.

The human soul is much like an airplane and most people are stuck never getting off the ground. They read and study the airplane, but never get in and fly. They belong to the “Flat Consciousness Society!”

The entire process of the Bible and every other religion can be explained in “frequencies of consciousness” and how to purify and raise the soul frequencies to higher levels. Scientific studies have proven this.

Perception of reality is a function of the frequency of consciousness from which you view it. I merely raise my frequency and the souls of others becomes physical to me. It’s how the mystics of all religions do what they do.

Prayer, meditation and following the guidelines set forth in the Bible are the tools to raise consciousness frequency. Sin is any obstacle to Love that exists within a person’s soul. These are physical to me. In fact, if I walk near a person and merely push the memory of the sin many feet from a person’s physical body, it often knocks them off their feet.

You folks make this way to complex. Socrates understood what I am saying. Plato did not. Many of the Greek pre Socratic philosophers understood it too. It really is simple when you go for the experience rather than the intellectual understanding.


11 posted on 01/12/2020 6:36:24 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ve been reading Maimonedes’ “Guide for the Perplexed”.

Taking me a long time, each section very rich in thought-provoking analysis. And his voluminous references keep sending me off on tangents to further investigate.

But all in all, an excellent apologetic exegis.


12 posted on 01/12/2020 6:39:56 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Descartes is give credit for the statement, “I think therefore I am.” That really is a dumb statement as it is very circular. If I ask him who it is that “Is doing the thinking?” his reply would be “me”, or “I am.”

My reply would be, “Who is I?”

The human physical body is merely a cocoon for the development of consciousness, like a seed pod does for a plant, until it grows to exist without the seed pod and it sheds it. When you grow spiritually, you begin to perceive directly from consciousness without your 5 physical senses.

It takes some work, but you quickly learn to know the thoughts of others and learn more in epiphanies than reading and studying. In the beginning was the word, and that word was made flesh. A word is merely a metaphor for pattern of consciousness that has meaning. That is how we were made in God’s image. We are seeds of consciousness.


13 posted on 01/12/2020 6:43:28 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The argument from contingency makes a lot of sense to me. So does the argument from morality. C. S. Lewis' book, Mere Christianity, is based on the argument from morality and is well-reasoned.

Anselm's ontological argument always seemed weak to me. If I understand it, he says that because I can imagine a God who is greater than anything then he must exist because his existence in reality would be greater than in my imagination. But I can imagine a lot of things that would be greater in reality than in my mind. That doesn't mean they exist. It just doesn't add up for me.

18 posted on 01/12/2020 6:58:56 AM PST by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Skeptics and atheists insist that belief in God is irrational.

Because they stop at Darwin and never gave any thought to where everything came from

19 posted on 01/12/2020 7:01:35 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There’s no question that we live in a highly improbable universe. There is no explanation for, among many other things, the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and the origin of human life.

The current materialistic “explanation” is that we live in one of a very large number of universes, so that - as improbable as is our existence - there were many, many chances for something very improbable to occur. The materialistic explanation is that somebody eventually will win the powerball lottery every day for ten years in a row. For a rational person, if somebody were to win the powwerball lottery every day for ten years in a row, it would prove that that lottery was fixed.

The question isn’t how improbable is the universe, it is whether the Creator of the universe is a personal God, one who loves us and who is just and merciful.

The argument against there being a loving God is the existence of evil in the world. Once you consider that there is a loving God, then you have to deal with such facts as Adolph Hitler. The answer to this is that God has given us free will. But, why such enormous evil? Why wouldn’t a loving God have some kind of test in which innocent people weren’t hurt so badly by evil people?

As Christians, while we have answers to many questions, we too have unanswered questions. Thus, in this life, we need faith and hope in addition to love. Faith in what cannot be seen, and hope in the future. In the next life, when all questions are resolved, we will only need love.


21 posted on 01/12/2020 7:08:29 AM PST by Redmen4ever (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Or you could just point out that the claim of Divine Revelation at Sinai is self-vindicating. And now with computers we're finding codes in the Torah as well.
23 posted on 01/12/2020 7:12:48 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Modernism began two thousand years ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The fool has said in his heart that there is no god


25 posted on 01/12/2020 7:24:34 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Thankfully, there has been no short supply of men of genius over the centuries who have shown that there is nothing at all irrational about theism.

20 arguments for the existence of God:

1 argument from change
2 argument from efficient causality
3 argument from time and contingency
4 argument from degrees of perfection
5 argument from design
6 kalam argument
7 argument from contingency
8 argument from the world as an interacting whole
9 argument from miracle
10 argument from consciousness
11 argument from truth
12 argument from the origin of the idea of God
13 ontological argument: Anselm’s version, modal version, possible worlds version
14 moral arguments
15 argument from conscience
16 argument from desire
17 argument from aesthetic experience
18 argument from religious experience
19 common consent argument
20 Pascal’s wager

27 posted on 01/12/2020 7:41:29 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; LucyT
The universe is not self-explanatory. In the final analysis, only something beyond the universe, something that is not contingent, can account for it.

See that is the ultimate bottom line. I am a fundamental Christian because I accept Jesus Christ as Lord of All; I have an ongoing daily relationship with God who tells me when what I am thinking about doing is wrong and who often tells me things I should do that I have not considered. Invariably when God tells me to do it, I win.

That aside, the atheist who says "well there is nothing beyond this life; the universe is explained by the big-bang theory . . . . " misses the end point. Without God, you can hypothetically explain many of the obvious temporal fact you can see and touch--at the end, it is all still encompassed in the universe.

Where is the universe located? "The stars and the heavens are testimony to the existence and power of God." The bible outright tells you the overall outright power of the Creator and is testimony as to His existence. There is simply no other explanation than God.

28 posted on 01/12/2020 7:41:50 AM PST by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If He doesn’t exist, current knowledge would make us the biggest accident in the history of ... history/pre-history/forever...


29 posted on 01/12/2020 7:49:36 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

His creation cries out, no, SCREAMS a creator. Not JUST Jupiter.

Ever look at a map of ocean currents? They control (in part) our weather. So complex, yet all working together for our (all living things) benefit.

I always liked the saying about evolution, that if a tornado blew through a junk yard, you wouldn’t end up with a Mercedes.


30 posted on 01/12/2020 7:55:58 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bible summary on this:

The fool says there is no God.

Everyone knows there is a God.

Some people suppress their knowledge of God , because of sin.


38 posted on 01/12/2020 8:35:37 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson