Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2020 8:36:35 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 100American; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

PING!


2 posted on 01/09/2020 8:37:31 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

When us old, white guys are all dead the world will burn.

Just sayin’.


4 posted on 01/09/2020 8:39:45 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Aging is a more immediate threat than climate change. Why isn’t the UN doing anything to slow it down?


7 posted on 01/09/2020 8:59:36 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In the meantime the world's population (now 7.7 billion) continues to grow:


8 posted on 01/09/2020 9:10:20 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I can’t speak for other countries but I think more people in the US would have kids if they knew the fed wasn’t just going to corral them into debt slavery. Artificial low interest rates and money printing has completely perverted consumer behavior to the point where everyone is trying to spend themselves into happiness and fulfillment. The ones at the top and the bottom vie for wealth transfers to either keep playing or the opportunity to play at all.


10 posted on 01/09/2020 9:10:36 PM PST by ammodotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"...show rapid aging..."

Baloney, I'm getting older just as fast as last year.

13 posted on 01/09/2020 9:27:53 PM PST by budj (Combat vet, 2nd of three generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I’ve noticed more Earthly wrinkles lately... /s

I cringe at just about anything the U. S. addresses these days.


15 posted on 01/09/2020 9:47:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The Leftistist media and particularly CNN NEWS should come with a ten day supply of Cipro.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There never was a "population bomb." The problem will be how to sustain a modern industrial consumer driven economy with a shrinking population. The bottom line is it's probably not possible.

But no worries, when the next ice age comes, a shrinking population will be a plus.

16 posted on 01/09/2020 10:29:48 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Is it above one year per year?

Wake me when it gets there.


17 posted on 01/10/2020 12:00:55 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I cant see retirement being a thing much longer unless you can fund it yourself. Pension age has been drawn out to 67 here in Australia and there is talk of extending that to 70 soon enough! I cant see pensions being available in the future as our country has never saved for them - Its just been a Ponzi Scheme! They have known about this since the 70’s and not done a damn thing savings wise!


18 posted on 01/10/2020 12:29:59 AM PST by melsec (There's a track, winding back, to an old forgotten shack along the road to Gundagai..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
What follows is a five-year-old reply submitted to change the reflexive attitude entertained by many conservatives, especially faux conservatives at places like the Wall Street Journal, who hold that only an ever increasing population in an age of technological revolution the like of which the world has never seen is necessary for growth and prosperity:

Well for heaven sakes man why have you been keeping this chart a secret? Why haven't you shown it [ a chart maintaining that the entire growing population in the world could be comfortably ensconced in West Texas] to the people of Los Angeles and to the people of Las Vegas begging for water? Why haven't you shown it to the people who are sitting in traffic jams in New Jersey for hours in commutes?

The truth is there is very little habitable and attractive land with good climate where people want to live. The idea that you're going to put 9 billion people in the wastes of West Texas is too absurd to debate.

But let us consider the idea of installing 9 billion people in one state and I will show you a dystopia rivaling our worst prisons. State control of everything would be mandatory; there will be no liberty. Everything, and I mean everything including air, light, water and exercise space for children would be rationed. The more density the less quality of life, the more density the less liberty.

The absolute number of people competing for space on the highways, for public services, for a hearing in our courts, our fish stocks, our beaches, our waterways, our land-use, all compete against one another for these resources. Inevitably, the government must arbitrate among these competing claims. Inevitably, those free beaches will be denied you and you will lose that liberty, just as you have lost your liberty to freely fish, to hunt, to build on your own land, to visit our national parks, to maintain animals on your property, etc. Do you really think your right to drink soda from a 16 ounce cup is in jeopardy in sparsely populated North Dakota as it is in densely populated New York City? Do you really think in a society of 310 million people we can survive without zoning laws limiting your right to use your property? You just lost liberty. It was not so when I was a youngster with 140 million people.

This is not a conservative question, we don't have to deny that there is insufficient habitable and desirable land for the doubling of American population every fifty years in order to maintain our conservative credentials. I don't know where this notion that growing population is good comes from among conservatives. Is it because misguided conservatives do not want to admit a predicate that allows for abortion? Is it because there is a Roman Catholic tradition that does not want to admit a predicate for birth control? Is it to sustain the Wall Street Journal's editorial approach of open borders? Is it because there is a misguided conservative tradition that no land use controls can be accepted even when we need actual protection from our neighbors?

The idea of Jeffersonian democracy, the idea of the New England Cracker Barrel democracy, only works when there is sufficient space for man to live independent both of his neighbor and the government. Double your population and halve your liberties


19 posted on 01/10/2020 12:42:29 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

From the headline,I thought Mother Earth was suddenly feeling her age...


22 posted on 01/10/2020 3:54:19 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson