1 posted on
01/08/2020 10:49:25 PM PST by
Morgana
To: Morgana
Satanists getting sicker by the day.
2 posted on
01/08/2020 10:51:26 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(Dear Mr. Kotter, #Epsteindidntkillhimself - Signed, Epstein's Mother)
To: Morgana
South Carolina citizens, who is the nutcase? Is the district a stupid district?
5 posted on
01/09/2020 3:52:41 AM PST by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: Morgana
Interesting name for a woman; is that now the new liberal description - gestational surrogate?
6 posted on
01/09/2020 5:44:26 AM PST by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Morgana
The state didn’t force sex on them, therefore, there is no ‘taking’ argument.
7 posted on
01/09/2020 6:20:17 AM PST by
CARTOUCHE
(One Day Closer to CW II)
To: Morgana
The state didn’t force sex on them, therefore, there is no ‘taking’ argument.
8 posted on
01/09/2020 6:20:36 AM PST by
CARTOUCHE
(One Day Closer to CW II)
To: Morgana
Because, as you know, the ‘state’ is responsible for every living breathing human, so if there’s one of those humans you can’t kill when you want to, then the state has to compensate you. This is going to be a boon for all the muggers suffering financial loss because they’re not legally allowed to kill their victims.
9 posted on
01/10/2020 10:38:42 AM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Morgana
It cant take away a rental property from you without paying you so if it wants to rent your womb to incubate your child then it has to compensate and its a constitutional issue of taking property or requiring the citizen to serve the state which they cant do without compensation.
False analogy here. The government takes your rental property to use for the government's use. But your womb and your child have nothing to do with the government. The only way this analogy works is if the government is paying you to get pregnant in the first place, with a child that belongs to the government, not you.
There would be virtually no way to prevent women from fabricating an intention to have an abortion so they could receive these benefits.
And there would be virtually every mother in the state claiming this. Too easy to just talk to your doc at some point considering abortion: "Oh no I can't? 'Sad' day... Bring me that SC Form BB-001!" Does the State really expect to be paying for every single pregnant woman? How much a month are they planning to pay out?
It further would allow a pregnant woman to claim a preborn child who has a detectable heartbeat as a child for tax credit purposes.
Hm. And guess how many people are going to accidentally (or "accidentally") count said unborn child on their federal returns? Allowing that on State law when Feds don't allow it until birth year, is gonna cause all sorts of issues for people. Straight up stupid.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson