Posted on 01/08/2020 11:58:44 AM PST by Red Badger
A sign reading Where do we go? sits on University Avenue next to a homeless encampment on CalTrans property as one of the residents of the encampment prepares to ride a bike on Tuesday, October 22, 2019 in Berkeley, Calif. Photo: Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle
The homeless places would be empty if there was a sign that said No Blacks or Whites.
The more you give them the more they want.
And the more your make.
Which promptly evaporated into the ether.............
Oh Goody
That should bring another 200,000 of them or so
Hundreds of thousands of square miles of open land in the West and the MidWest owned by the FedGov that could be homesteaded but...nooooo....they gotta live in the prime real estate country
NewScum is so gone
Where did that $650 MILLION DOLLARS go?..................Now he wants to give away $750 MILLION DOLLARS.............to somewhere over the rainbow.........
Why work?
Camp outside, stay stoned and rob someone when you need more drugs, repeat.
This always ends well..../not
I think it is a great idea.
There will be more than 200K
Every case manager in the country will have discharge plans consisiting of a bus ticket to California.
They all smoke and all flip butts and matches on the ground, maybe an Australia Inferno thing will help them into the promised land they thought they found
Let me guess... vacant state land, i.e., uber-dry foothills. Cali evenings can be a bit on the cool side, so someone will want to keep warm with a campfire... what could possibly go wrong?
Raise taxes...why didn’t they think of this before..it’s so stupid it might just work!
I didn’t know there was anything left to burn in California!..............
If they raise taxes high enough the problem will solve itself..................
I am sure that the residents of Del Mar will be happy to have thousands of vagrants living across the street at the Del Mar Fairgrounds /s. That is California Department of Agriculture land as is the Los Angeles Coliseum.
I wonder which of th 4 richest power families in Cali will benefit the most.....probably pelosi....
This worries me as it says nothing about ownership. If I bought a decommissioned hospital with some future use in mind, does this mean the state can come in and dump the homeless there? Not clear to me.
Institutionalized squatting/vagrancy.
Heck, why buy a home when you can just set up shop on some unincorporated state land?
Concentration camps for the homeless?
About time. It’s what progressives have been doing since the British starved and allowed to die by disease tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians in the South Africa Boer war of the late 1800’s in THEIR camps.
Should work well. Kudos Chairman Newsome, kudos.
In addition, how about putting up a soothing, welcoming sign, maybe something like "California State Hospice"? And the state workers could wear nice, crisp white uniforms too boot.
LOL. I have said it for awhile, but there was never going to be any movement forward on the issue of mentally ill addicts living on the streets until proglibs made the move.
And who represents the biggest segment of so-called bleeding heart felt proggies? (Single) women + children. And who is impacted the most by filthy mentally ill lurking around public places, such as parks, parking lots, toilets, etc?
At the end of the day, there is truly cosmic justice, as well as some kind of universal balance. The only reason Newsome/state is moving to re-institutionalize is because of their base, and that's because women have finally had enough.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.