Posted on 01/08/2020 3:48:09 AM PST by Kaslin
Understand these facts first and foremost: Qassem Soleimani was a career state-sponsored terrorist whose financial, ideological and strategic sponsor was the Iranian theocratic dictatorship the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini founded in 1979.
Another fact: In 1984, the U.S. State Department placed Iran on its list of state sponsors of terrorism. If 1984 sounds like an Orwellian omen, 1983 was arguably more apt. The 1979 assault on and occupation of the U.S. embassy in Tehran by Khomeini's zealots constituted an attack on sovereign U.S. territory and ought to rate as terrorism. Holding 52 American diplomats hostage for 444 days while screaming, "Death to America," in my view crossed the criminal terrorist line. However, the Iran-sponsored 1983 bombing of Beirut's U.S. Marine barrack was definitely terror. Lebanese Shiite Iran proxies -- Lebanese Hezbollah being their nom de guerre -- were identified as the culprits.
Soleimani's status as a career terrorist and the ayatollah regime's career commitment to financing, training and using terrorists are absolutely essential contexts for understanding the latest clashes in the long war on America that Khomeini proclaimed in 1979.
The most sensational recent violence was Soleimani's Jan. 3 assassination by American missiles as he arrived in Iraq, likely fired by unmanned aerial vehicles circling above Baghdad International Airport but perhaps fired by an American attack helicopter.
Ignore the propagandists claiming otherwise. The U.S. had every right to kill the evil man. Soleimani was a terrorist, and the Quds Force of the Iranian Republican Guard Corps he commanded is a terrorist organization.
Soleimani's life and livelihood depended on cruel threat enforced by sensational murder, usually mass murder. His goal was intimidating any opponent of Iran's dictatorship (real or imagined, domestic or foreign, Muslim or of any other faith).
Soleimani was the chief architect of Iran's proxy terror and militia organizations throughout the world. There is evidence he had provided operational direction to proxies operating in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq and perhaps Africa as well.
The Pentagon believes Soleimani was responsible for killing over 600 U.S. military personnel in Iraq. Given his crimes in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq, I'll wager his overall homicide toll exceeds 100,000. In Syria, Soleimani employed Lebanese Hezbollah as a gang of thugs to keep Bashar Assad's dictatorship in power.
Soleimani was killed in Iraq. So? He was waging a war in Iraq and on Iraq using Iran's "Shia popular militia force" proxies. Getting killed in Iraq is a known risk if you wage war in Iraq.
Which is why Soleimani's decision to brazenly arrive at Baghdad International Airport and slide into an SUV strikes me as stupidity bred by fatal arrogance. It indicates a fool's contempt for his enemies. Soleimani ignored the old saw that every truly smart warrior knows to be bitter truth: Your enemy always gets a vote. If your enemy decides to shoot back (his vote), you have to respond. Attack, retreat, freeze -- these are sample visceral responses. So think ahead.
Soleimani's action indicates he believed himself exempt from this bitter truth. America is an enemy that can vote by diplomatic and economic means. On the battlefield American votes range from Delta Force knives (and dogs) to drone-fired missiles to B-52 bomb raids to nuclear weapons and -- within the next three or so years -- battlefield lasers.
Perhaps the Iranian mastermind misread President Donald Trump. In June 2019, Trump ordered strikes on Iranian missile sites after the IRGC downed an American drone. When told U.S. reprisals might kill 150 people, Trump scrubbed the missions. He said 150 humans dead was not a proportionate response to a downed unmanned plane. His decision had biblical resonance. Blood for blood when Iran kills Americans. Otherwise, drone for drone.
In January 2020, the U.S. took blood for blood. Note the Iranian drone raid yesterday on Iraq avoided striking Americans.
Kim Jong Un, pay attention.
Isn’t Soliemani Iran’s go to terrorist responsible for exacting revenge on the Great Satan when the US takes action against Iran’s terrorism? Where was he during the attack show last night? Oh, that’s right, he was indisposed at that moment. The only person as releived as Trump that little damage occurred during the attack was the Ayotollah who produced this piece of theater for the benefit of the folks at the terror mosque back home. He had to be fearful of what would happen if it was perceived as anything more than an empty gesture, much like the show put on by a dog wagging former impeached president of the Great Satan. Unlike Clinton, Trump has no dog to wag during his impeachment because for him killing Soliemani was a mere distraction from his enjoyable view of the Democrats flagellating themselves like Shia religious fanatics with the impeachment whip they hung around their necks like an albatross and couldn’t figure out what to do with when they started choking from it.
Whom the Gods would Destroy
They first make Proud.
Pride goeth before the fall.
Those who live by the sword, die by the sword.
A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
Ivanka Trump will be the first female president of the United States
never ...
Maybe if she runs as a Dem there is NO WAY she could win as a Republican!!!
The Beirut barracks bombing was ordered directly by Tehran and carried out by an elite IRGC controlled unit
Admiral James Lyons gave a very detailed public disclosure of that attack, the intelligence, and that Reagan did not respond, or actually Caspar Weinberger failed to issue the execute order he had been given for the retaliatory strike
If she does become president, I hope Hilbeast is alive to see it.
Soleomani probably thought the POTUS hands were tied because of impeachment. So give Pelosi’s band of bandits credit for his demise.
We don’t need a dynasty!
We don’t need a libtard!
Michelle Obama will be the first US President.
“Michelle Obama will be the first US President.”
You mean the first US tranny President?
Ivanka is liberalish. When it come to a woman POTUS, I’d rather see someone like say Sarah Palin instead.
Democrats, take note.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.