Posted on 01/06/2020 1:21:08 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Scientists have developed a method that allows them to identify so-called climate change "fingerprints" in daily weather observations - and it found consistent evidence of global warming every day since late March 2012.
Using climate models and statistical learning techniques, a team of researchers at ETH Zurich in Switzerland were able to identify climate change's "fingerprint" in global daily mean temperatures, which had been calculated from measurements collected in locations across the world.
The researchers highlighted that while local daily mean temperatures might fluctuate significantly year-on-year, global daily mean measurements show a consistent trend towards global warming.
They say their data modeling enables them to pinpoint the "fingerprint" of climate change on global measurements for any day since late March 2012 and every month since 2001.
"Weather at the global level carries important information about climate," Reto Knutti, a professor in climate science at ZTH, said in a statement. "This information could, for example, be used for further studies that quantify changes in the probability of extreme weather events, such as regional cold spells."
The researchers say their model could help explain the occurrence of abnormal regional weather events - such as cold snaps - and help the study of long-term climate change that might be "masked" by regional variations in temperature.
"In future, we should therefore be able to pick out human-induced patterns and trends in other more complex measurement parameters, such as precipitation, that are hard to detect using traditional statistics," said Knutti.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
EVERY DAY, almost, it got WARMER during the daylight hours and COLDER at night.
[[[Scientists have developed a method that allows them to identify so-called climate change “fingerprints” in daily weather observations - and it found consistent evidence of global warming every day since late March 2012.]]]
LOL.
“lets see if this sticks to the wall, guys”
Sure, the world is warming. It’s been warming since the Little Ice Age. The real question is what’s causing it, something natural in the grand scheme of things, or mankind, or both. Another question is “How much warming has their been?”
The real takeaway here is that we’re back to focusing on “Global Warming.” That’s progress because it pins them down to one issue, instead of the vague “climate change” which the warmists settled on when we went over a decade with no noticeable warming.
Now they’re back to “global warming” which is of course where they’ve always been anyway, and the next warming hiatus can be used against their case. Or, over time, a failure to warm as fast as they predict will also diminish their influence.
Blah..Blah..Blah, so on and so forth.. therefore.. Oh HORSE$HIT!
so....it only took Zero 4 years to change the climate for the worse?
The Hansen, Mann and Jones Climate Change Model (aka Global Warming Hockey Stick Model) is constructed so that you enter the desired result and the model produces data to support the result.
FAKE NEWS!
Total Poppy-cock!
The Earth is as good as it ever was!
Move on!
That’s nice but it’s not warm enough yet.
It is not science when you claim that every day shows evidence of global warming. It just shows only that the “researcher” has a biased point of view that makes him completely useless as a seeker of the truth.
Just a little warmer please. I’m fine with warming, just glad the ice age predicted in the ‘70s didn’t happen
I have evidence that Global Warming is a hoax.
Sorry, but I cannot look at the evidence, because it would blind me. The Sun is just too friggen bright !
Understood.... With that being said, every forest taken down to accommodate housing subdivisions removes dead growth that produces nothing towards the enhancement of oxygen production but rather removes the dead and decaying undergrowth that consumes any oxygen the forest trees above it produces..........
Every new subdivision that creates new green landscaping such as lawns and grass, shrubs, bushes and trees all produce a positive oxygen output where before there was nothing...........
The researchers say their model could help explain the occurrence of abnormal regional weather events - such as cold snaps - and help the study of long-term climate change that might be "masked" by regional variations in temperature.
For years the warming alarmists have told us weather is not climate but they have often cited a heat wave as proof of warming while dismissing a cold snap as proof of cooling.
This is their 'have your cake and eat it too'. They can now claim any and every weather event, hot or cold, wet or dry, as proof of warming.
This is not science. It's fraud. The gullible are easily conned by con men.
They're not even subtle anymore.
Yep, double bag BARF!
On par with the big lies of the Nazi’s.
Pretty sure the fingerprint is going to belong to them
If their damn models are so accurate, plot of the next 3,000 days within 5% accuracy (+-2.5%).
Let them stake their lives and wealth on it. They commit fraud and know it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.