Skip to comments.Julian Castro ends presidential campaign
Posted on 01/02/2020 6:52:20 AM PST by rdl6989
Julián Castro ended his presidential campaign on Thursday after the former Housing and Urban Development secretary failed to gain traction in the large field of Democratic candidates.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
racist donkeys wouldn’t support the brown skinned dude. RACIST!!!!!
There’s a heart breaker.
Hard to stop something that never really started
Another RAT presidential candidate of color bites the dust! Damn them DemoKKKrats is racist!
Will someone else take his spot in the clown car?
Dems only want old, white guys.
Mr La Raza - his mommie is a commie who helped start La Raza race group - need not apply.
How did those castro twins ever get out of cuba and away from daddy? S/Off
He was never going to be President, we’re not North Mexico yet.
I think he, and several others, only entered to increase and further his name recognition. It was never to secure the nomination. Just political chess.
There’s only one... just one reason these egg heads are running. TO MAKE SOME EXTRA CASH.
The handlers of Pete Buttigieg see the guy as a cash cow.
Easily, there’s a lot of money to be made running for office.
They all know they have no chance on winning. But their PACs and direct donations are going to them....and their people.
Who are the Brown people supporting?
Julian dropping out just proves the point that Democrats are RACISSSSSSSSSS.
Buh bye, you America-hating tower of hate. Don’t let the screen door hit ya where the good L-rd split ya, you putrid bum.
He never had a chance anyway. But I bet he’s got money left over that he can just roll over into his next campaign.
How about “election campaign finance reform” laws that require politicians to refund back to their campaign donors any funds their campaign has left when their campaign closes and disallow the money being used in a subsequent campaign. Maybe it is right to suggest that donors who “invested” in a candidate for one election may not think their money was intended to support the same candidate in any other election, and that a campaign that keeps the left over money is committing fraud. Maybe the politician’s campaign treasurer should have to keep detail records of every donor, no matter how small, and when the campaign is over the donors get a refund from the campaign fund’s balance, proportionate to their donation’s portion of all donations.
Do you think the Dims would support such a “transparency in election campaign funds” law? Nah.
And oh, by the way, there are no diacritical marks in English. This article is written in English, yes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.