Never believe a plaintiff’s lawyer. His goal is extracting personal financial gain by lying to a gullible jury.
The computerized health records available to patients at password protected sites are a boon to maintaining one’s wellness. Those who are ignorant and lazy will not benefit, but that is their problem and not the fault of the available records. .
When the quality of the data is so poor, what makes them a boon?
What level of quality would you accept as a boon?
If my shop, or a hospital, has access to data on a million people and the data is wrong on allegies to medicines in some how many errors are acceptable?
1 in a million? 1 in 100,000? 1 in 100? 1 in 10?
When determining how much taxpayer money goes where, what level of data quality is acceptable?
Let’s spend taxpayer money on Maternal and Infant death. What level of data quality is acceptable to design the program and actually have a positive effect on the death rate?