Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Iraq wasn’t all that stable even under Saddam. Why else did he need to gas the Kurds, flood the Marsh Arabs, etc.?


56 posted on 12/31/2019 4:39:43 AM PST by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Chad_the_Impaler
He dealt effectively with the unrest, didn’t he?

Iraq’s instability was a function of its artificial borders. The country was rested out of the remnants of the Ottoman Empire after World War I, and it was cobbled together with different sects and cultures that never would have been part of a unified country if left on their own.

Establishing “democracy” in a place like that is a recipe for disaster.

58 posted on 12/31/2019 4:44:43 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson