Posted on 12/30/2019 12:25:46 PM PST by Kaslin
The Washington Posts media critic Erik Wemple is doing a multi-part series about the Trump dossier. Its rather brutal. With the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz delivering the final kill shot to the document that led to the Russian collusion hysteria that engulfed the media for two years, there is a reckoning coming. No one will be fired, but large amounts of crow are on the menu. As weve said often, the Post is liberal, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. If there is one network that is unhinged by Trump, unabashedly liberal, and totally consumed by the Russian collusion myth, it has to be MSNBC. The network is meant to keep liberal blood pressures low.
Host Rachel Maddows coverage of the Trump dossier was ripped as misleading and dishonest by Wemple who dove into a lengthy timeline of the malpractice. Maddow wanted the dossier to be trueand it all blew up in her face. The dossier was compiled by Christopher Steele who was hired by research firm Fusion GPS to get dirt on Trump. Fusions services were retained by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democrats. It was a politically biased piece of opposition research that was cited as credible evidence to secure a FISA spy warrant against Carter Page, a former Trump campaign official. And all of this while the FBI suffered systemic failures in obtaining that warrant that included omission or exclusion of exculpatory evidence against Page. The FISA court has demanded an overhaul. And once again, we have an insight into how the government can destroy peoples lives with impunity. This dossier is ground zero for the nonsense that was bellowed into the airwaves for months, with zero evidence to back any of it up. But remember that time Maddow said the dossier had Trump dead to rights? Heres part of that timeline Wemple put together (via WaPo):
Name a host on cable news who has dug more deeply into Trump-Russia than MSNBCs Rachel Maddow. Shes read hundreds, maybe thousands, of court filings; shes read the plume of literature on Russia-Trump; and shes out with a new book on the bane of petro-states: Blowout: Corrupted Democracy, Rogue State Russia, and the Richest, Most Destructive Industry on Earth.
[ ]
Sorting through the silence from the FBI and the unverified claims in the dossier, Maddow riffed on her Jan. 13, 2017, program: I mean, had the FBI looked into what was in that dossier and found that it was all patently false, they could tell us that now, right? said Maddow. I mean, the dossier has now been publicly released. If the FBI looked into it and they found it was all trash, theres no reason they cant tell us that now. Theyre not telling us that now. Theyre not saying that. Theyre not saying anything.
That line of analysis has gained some important context via the Horowitz report. The FBI did, in fact, find potentially serious problems with Steeles reporting as early as January 2017. A source review in March 2017 did not make any findings that would have altered that judgment.
[ ]
On May 3, 2017, Maddow cited a CNN report that parts of this dossier passed muster even in federal court when the dossier was used in part to justify a secret FISA court warrant for U.S. surveillance on a Trump campaign adviser. Thanks to Horowitz, we now know that officials misused the dossier in this process, failing to disclose to the FISA court dossier-debunking information. Never place blind faith in the FBI!
The Republican claim today was that the dossier has been increasingly discredited. Thats not true in terms of the public record about the dossier. In fact, its quite the opposite. As time goes on, more and more pieces do get independently corroborated, Maddow said.
[ ]
On Oct. 5, 2017, Maddow said that Steele had a lot of the dossier dead to rights.
[ ]
The release of the Mueller report in April provided a kick in the derriere for backers of the dossier. As Glenn Kessler pointed out in The Post, the central allegation of the dossier an extensive conspiracy between campaign team and Kremlin, sanctioned at highest levels and involving Russian diplomatic staff based in the US as well as an "Agreed exchange of information established in both directions found no corroboration from Muellers investigation, even though the special counsels team was charged with probing just this matter.
Several days after the Mueller report emerged, Maddow addressed not the dissonance between Mueller and the dossier, but a point of possible corroboration.
When the story began to fall apart, as some of us already knew it would because there was no evidence, Maddow found other topics more compelling. She was there for the bunkings, absent for the debunkings a pattern of misleading and dishonest asymmetry, wrote Wemple. I mean a lot of media members did that with the DOJ IG report focusing on the no bias portion of the report, which really isnt true. There is no memo from FBI officials that were entitled get Trump, as The Wall Street Journals Kimberley Strassel noted, but personal bias existed.
Media Misrepresentation. @KimStrassel says IG Horowtiz report did find personal bias, despite reports otherwise by the National Left-Wing media. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/3tcbhHQxTM Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) December 12, 2019
And now the kill shot:
Over a nearly two-year investigation released on Dec. 9, Horowitz and a team of investigators reviewed at least a million records, interviewed more than 100 individuals and otherwise probed the actions of the FBI and the Justice Department in the Russia investigation. In so doing, they reached an answer to Maddows question.
[ ]
The FBI concluded, among other things, that although consistent with known efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections, much of the material in the Steele election reports, including allegations about Donald Trump and members of the Trump campaign relied upon in the Carter Page FISA applications, could not be corroborated; that certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent with information gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team; and that the limited information that was corroborated related to time, location and title information, much of which was publicly available.
Dead to rights, huh? So, it looks like Maddow wrote an entire book based on fake news. Oh, and she refused to offer an on-the-record comment for Wemples story.
“Its obvious something must have blew up in her face.”
Well, it’ll never be a guy.
Because she was eager to tell them the lies they were desperate to hear.
I am amazed none of these people seem to have neighbors who know who they are!
So when will she be deplatformed like Alex Jones?
But leftists don’t eat crow. They try to shove it in the faces of conservatives. After a bit of disorganization and some unfortunate admissions the narrative will be reassembled and it will all be Tru’s or the Republican’s fault that it happened or the whole RUSSIA witchhunt will be justified and the Dossier proclaimed once again to have been TRUE but it all got messed up by a right wing Conspiracy.
Fake but accurate 2.0
...................................
Maddow is a professional lesbian who made herself more telegenic by looking like Peyton Manning in drag.................
Someone call her a wambulance......
You don't have to actually tell the truth to make a bunch of money off of fake news, you just have to get a bunch of fools to pay for listening to your lies.
“They repeat the same lies to each other, over and over,”
Actually they are repeating them to us.
(...or like Don Imus...for NOTHING!).
Poor little boy.
maddow, the pervert, lies once again...or is that continues to lie (what’s new?). What a duplicitous, dishonest cretin of the highest order.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.