[frank ballenger]

Horrible thought in my overtired mind tonight: what if the Dems impeach Trump again over exposing the whistleblower?

Loss of office by a tweet. First in history.
Hope not.

[2111USMC]

There is no law that protects the identity of a whistle blower. NONE

[CedarDave]

Horrible thought in my overtired mind tonight: what if the Dems impeach Trump again over exposing the whistleblower? Loss of office by a tweet. First in history. Hope not.

That's exactly what they will do. They will claim that Trump broke the law by revealing his name. Even if it's more of a technicality (his name is widely known), it will be similar to "Scooter" Libby revealing the name of Valerie Plame even though it had already been revealed. The Dems will claim (at last!) that they (finally!) will have something they can convict him of.

[American in Israel]

There is no law for anonymity for whistleblowers.

Also as the whistle blew out falsehoods not facts, he who blows is not a whistleblower, but a false witness guilty of perjury and slander and Is NOT protected from prosecution.

Just like all Demo ratic Party talking points its poll tested 100% Bovine excretement.

[JoSixChip]

Horrible thought in my overtired mind tonight: what if the Dems impeach Trump again over exposing the whistleblower?

They would have to prove that Trump knows for a fact who the WB is. I doubt that Trump has been informed who the WB is in any way other then from speculation. It's not illegal in any way to retweet someone's speculation in a original tweet. But I can see several lily livered senators being "very disturbed" by it.