Yes, I didn’t mean to imply I consider it open-and-shut vis-à-vis BK. Rather, I consider it a strong possibility, which is not to say BK seems otherwise undeserving. I say that because certain strong evidence in the case was apparently ignored. Those with responsible eyes should have seemingly dealt with that evidence openly, not by ignoring it or covering it up.
Another conservative I know believes more strongly than I that BK came in line for the job because he “looked the other way” on the Foster case, but I haven’t seen that evidence, assuming it exists.
A good many of us think they looked the other way, particularly with Foster. There were problems all over the map on that one. Maggie Williams, Hillary’s chief of staff took things from Foster’s office on orders from the First Lady alone, and then moved to France until things cooled off.
Some folks had their heads firmly implanted...