Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyDancer

Those of us who favor Subsidiarity would say “yes”, states could in theory ban all guns.

Let’s be consistent and apply Subsidiarity further: I’d prefer counties within to be able to override those states.

Same principle applies to immigration, abortion, same-sex marriage


101 posted on 12/15/2019 2:31:10 PM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganGeneration2

I would just wonder if a state like Virginia the governor, in the name of public safety, would decree to ban all firearms of any type plus the ammunition for them state wide. That would be in direct conflict with the 2nd. Amendment, right?


102 posted on 12/15/2019 2:56:20 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2

Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts

It is settled that the Second Amendment protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms that applies
against both the Federal Government and the States.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570 (2008);
McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010).

McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.


104 posted on 12/15/2019 5:39:51 PM PST by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson