Skip to comments.
The Carter Page/Ukraine Lie That Kept On Lying for Mueller and the FBI
Realclear investigations.com ^
| 12/12/2019
| Paul Sperry
Posted on 12/12/2019 8:19:12 PM PST by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Erik Latranyi
To: Maris Crane
I agree %100 with your analysis. They are acting like if there was no malfeasance in the opening of a counter intel investigation, there was no malfeasance in the continuing of the investigation. Someone should ask Horowitz about that! Yes, he is a deep state turd and the only reason why he acted as he did because he is smart enough to realize that he may go to jail if he didn’t sell out the deep state.
22
posted on
12/13/2019 7:46:44 AM PST
by
gr8eman
(Stupid should hurt! Treason should hurt more!)
To: Paladin2
Horowitz may be somewhat straight forward but not being able to find any intent/bias is totally hackish.
Or it’s not going beyond what he can prove. His bias statement is very qualified: no documents declaring political bias, no testimony admitting to political bias.
He cited boatloads of misbehavior - some of it unequivocally criminal - and referred the entire chain for disciplinary review. He flatly stated he was unable to obtain ANY satisfactory explanation on ANY of the identified issues. What he didn’t do is make determinations between malfeasance and incredible misfeasance.
By being conservative in the parts that are judgement, he makes it difficult to assail his conclusions as biased. This it the opposite of a hack.
23
posted on
12/13/2019 1:15:21 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: gr8eman
They are acting like if there was no malfeasance in the opening of a counter intel investigation, there was no malfeasance in the continuing of the investigation.
Horowitz made it exceedingly clear that because the bar for opening the investigation was so absurdly and in his view inappropriately low, it was impossible to determine malfeasance for that stage. He makes clear that before the FISA warrant was applied to, there was a criminal alteration of evidence. He also makes clear that by mid-January, the justification of the continuing of the investigation had been completely voided and identified specific malfeasance or misfeasance in further applications and failure to reassess even having probable cause.
24
posted on
12/13/2019 1:22:01 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson