Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Carter Page/Ukraine Lie That Kept On Lying for Mueller and the FBI
Realclear investigations.com ^ | 12/12/2019 | Paul Sperry

Posted on 12/12/2019 8:19:12 PM PST by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Erik Latranyi

You forgot MSM.


21 posted on 12/13/2019 6:07:22 AM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maris Crane

I agree %100 with your analysis. They are acting like if there was no malfeasance in the opening of a counter intel investigation, there was no malfeasance in the continuing of the investigation. Someone should ask Horowitz about that! Yes, he is a deep state turd and the only reason why he acted as he did because he is smart enough to realize that he may go to jail if he didn’t sell out the deep state.


22 posted on 12/13/2019 7:46:44 AM PST by gr8eman (Stupid should hurt! Treason should hurt more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Horowitz may be somewhat straight forward but not being able to find any intent/bias is totally hackish.


Or it’s not going beyond what he can prove. His bias statement is very qualified: no documents declaring political bias, no testimony admitting to political bias.

He cited boatloads of misbehavior - some of it unequivocally criminal - and referred the entire chain for disciplinary review. He flatly stated he was unable to obtain ANY satisfactory explanation on ANY of the identified issues. What he didn’t do is make determinations between malfeasance and incredible misfeasance.

By being conservative in the parts that are judgement, he makes it difficult to assail his conclusions as biased. This it the opposite of a hack.


23 posted on 12/13/2019 1:15:21 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

They are acting like if there was no malfeasance in the opening of a counter intel investigation, there was no malfeasance in the continuing of the investigation.


Horowitz made it exceedingly clear that because the bar for opening the investigation was so absurdly and in his view inappropriately low, it was impossible to determine malfeasance for that stage. He makes clear that before the FISA warrant was applied to, there was a criminal alteration of evidence. He also makes clear that by mid-January, the justification of the continuing of the investigation had been completely voided and identified specific malfeasance or misfeasance in further applications and failure to reassess even having probable cause.


24 posted on 12/13/2019 1:22:01 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson