Posted on 12/11/2019 7:05:14 AM PST by Kaslin
Here is a chilling case of sanctuary chickens coming home to roost.
Upon being convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, home invasion and the brutal murders of two doctors on Tuesday, African criminal Bampumim Teixeira taunted the Massachusetts prosecutor who won the case and vowed to rape his wife. "You better hope I don't get out of jail," Teixeira threatened as he was dragged away in handcuffs by a quartet of court security officers. The killer appeared to greatly enjoy the media spectacle while striking fear into the hearts of innocents. He will be sentenced on Friday.
I am outraged on behalf of the victims' families and pray for the prosecutor's loved ones. But let's be clear: This homicidal beast is a beneficiary of liberal Bay State policies that coddle foreign evildoers and give them cover to wreak havoc in our homeland. The architects of open borders Boston have blood on their hands.
Teixeira was a repeat offender well-known to law enforcement and government officials before he snuck into the South Boston condo of Richard Field and Lina Bolano in 2017, bound and gagged them, slit their throats and stabbed them to death. A homeless vagrant from Guinea-Bissau in West Africa, Teixeira had been convicted of two bank robberies and was released from prison just weeks before the massacre at Field and Bolano's condo. This thieving bum's lawyer secured a deal with the Suffolk County district attorney's office to sentence him to 364 days for the second heist and downgraded the second felony crime to larceny
Why one day shy of a year? Why the reclassification of a felony to a misdemeanor?
The soft-on-alien-crime agreement allowed him to escape deportation, which any green card holder would normally face for committing crimes of moral turpitude or crimes that result in sentences of 365 days or more. Ultimately, he served only 9 months behind bars. This evilness is part of a nationwide move by far-left Democratic prosecutors, many subsidized and supported by open borders billionaire George Soros, to minimize "collateral immigration consequences of criminal convictions" and help immigrants evade "disproportionate collateral consequences, such as deportation. All in the name of "public safety" and celebrating diversity, of course.
For those outside of New England, let me tell you about the infamous public enemy, Suffolk County DA Rachael Rollins. In March, she ordered her employees to monitor and snitch on federal ICE officers hanging around any courthouse while trying to do their jobs. She is overseeing a radical "restorative justice" agenda to decrease arrests, detentions and prosecutions for both citizens and noncitizens. Our office, she announced, "will begin to factor into all charging and sentencing decisions the potential of immigration consequences."
Let me translate that for you: If foreign adults commit crimes that would separate them from their families and lead to imprisonment and deportation, DA Rollins will drop charges or shorten sentences in the name of social justice -- the law-abiding victims of these criminal immigrants be damned.
The anarchy-promoting DA grudgingly admitted to Boston talk show legend Howie Carr earlier this year that the Teixeira case was a "horrific situation." She said she would have "no problem" deporting convicted criminal immigrants, but only after they "shoot or rape or kill somebody." In other words: Always look the other way at immigration crimes until it's too late to save the lives of innocent people sacrificed at the altar of open borders.
As the people of Boston face a crucial vote by their city council this week on whether to make their sanctuary policies even more radical and welcoming for the world's homeless, jobless, drug dealers and gangbangers, I have questions:
Why shouldn't foreign law-breakers face "immigration consequences" for every single civil and criminal law they violate?
Why are Soros-bots across the country elevating the rights of criminal immigrants above law-abiding citizens?
Why aren't more Americans rising in revolt against open borders-sponsored politicians and prosecutors turning our neighborhoods into safe spaces for foreign outlaws?
Over the past three months, thousands have joined me at rallies to Stand with ICE and defend American First in so-called sanctuary cities from Boston to Aurora to Portland to Montgomery County, Maryland? What about the rest of you? What's your excuse?
Hopefully he gets a great big dose of "prison justice"..just like Whitey Bulger,Jeffrey Dahmer and,perhaps,Jeffrey Epstein.
Another beautiful by-product of the radical left....
Boston gets what it wants. It’s a safe bet even his victims were flaming progressives until the moment just before they were murdered.
What it wants, or what it deserves?
Glad to see the author naming those who are selling us out.
How long before a victim’s family retaliates against the politicians responsible?
In this article, they actually opened the Comments section, which surprised me.
Apparently both
I love Malkin..!
Death penalty.
No deportation
Win/win
Zact same thing happened in San Fran 9 years ago:
Mom sends dad out with the two sons together in the car to retrieve a pizza. Slight traffic altercation, MS-13 guy shoots & kills ALL THREE; mom was alone in the world.
Turns out the guy had illegally invaded SF 10 years prior, had for YEARS been a one-man, year-round crime-spree.
Yet the lib legal beagles of San Francisco had legally moved Heaven & Earf to keep this MurdererThiefBumScammerScum in the USA, away from the deportation hands of Uncle Sam.
She had a family when they got into the car, she had ZERO family 20 minutes later.
San Francisco KILLED HER WHOLE FAMILY.
Another beautiful by-product of the radical left....
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Micro Rubio, Flimsey Grahamnesty, and bunch of other Bush League Republicans tried to give him amnesty in 2013.
And 2006 and 2007, and they will again in 2021.
Do we want that HERE?
Countries are DNA, not magic dirt.
That will never happen here. And the rulers of the sheep know and understand this. This is why they do the things that they do. If they knew that they were going to be held accountable for their deeds, they would not do them.
Sorry...NO sympathy for anyone from Yankeeland...except the children!
Thank goodness that couple had no dangerous guns in the home. /heavy sarcasm off/
You may be right. Just surprised that someone hasn’t lost “all they had” and gone rogue.
Seems it has to happen sooner or later.
Can people like this not be charged with impeding?
Throw several of these scofflaws in the pokey with the ones they currently protect and see how quickly the tune changes
The vote is today to make Boston a Sancutary City before they head out for Christmas.
Jeff Kuhner 680am WRKO out of Boston was all over that story like a bumb on a baloney sandwich this morning.
Of this fame: [DA] Rachael Rollins blasts judge refusing to dismiss charges...Straight Pride Parade protesters
Which translates to,
Charges for which the Default is to Decline Prosecuting (unless supervisor permission is obtained).
Instead of prosecuting, these cases should be (1) outright dismissed prior to arraignment or (2) where appropriate, diverted and treated as a civil infraction for which community service is satisfactory, restitution is satisfactory or engagement with appropriate community-based no-cost programming, job training or schooling is satisfactory. In the exceptional circumstances where prosecution of one of these charges is warranted, the line DA must first seek permission from his or her supervisor. If necessary, arraignment will be continued to allow for consultation with supervisor. Thus, there will be an avenue for prosecuting these misdemeanors when necessary but it will be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors. 0 https://rollins4da.com/policy/charges-to-be-declin
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.