“Audit the FISA process???
How about bring about indictments, or at the very least....freaking hearings over these ‘irregularties’??”
Whoa, golly gee. FISA courts could lose Graham’s support? Is that worse than a strongly worded letter?
:-)
It’s a reallllllly strong worded letter. He means business, darn it.
I think we’re forgetting about the Durham investigation, which will have consequences.
They’ve done a good job today setting out the facts and exposing the irrationality of Horowitz’ whitewash. Remember, he’s not the one responsible for the actions, he reported them (and as with the conclusions about Hillary’s criminal violations of email security) then just shrugged and said nobody really meant it. All a misunderstanding.
But I think this makes it pretty obvious that it was intentional and will support prosecution of some of these people in the future.
Did I hear him say that might be OK with shutting down the whole FISA court system? (Not sure; I think I did.)
I wonder how far into the Durham investigation it’ll be before John Roberts’ name comes in to play as being involved.